Weill H, Salvaggio J, Neilson A, Butcher B, Ziskind M
Environ Health Perspect. 1975 Jun;11:101-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7511101.
A new plant manufacturing toluene diisocyanate (TDI) has provided a unique opportunity to investigate the effects of TDI vapor inhalation on respiratory health in a group of exposed workers who have been studied prior to the start of plant operation. In order to establish dose-response relationships and determine host factors, complete biologic monitoring, including pulmonary function and immunologic studies, has been performed concurrently with a comprehensive environmental monitoring program including continuous sampling for atmospheric concentrations of TDI. Study groups include workers with regular exposure to TDI in production jobs (83), workers with intermittent contact with this vapor, usually in maintenance (28), and a control group of workers employed outside the TDI area (55). This population is being followed for a period of 5 yr. The plant began operations in August 1973 with start-up procedures completed by the end of October. TDI spills occurred for numerous reasons, usually attributed to pump failure and resultant line blockage. Significant exposures also occurred in the drumming operation. The influence of these malfunctions is noted in the continuous monitoring data on atmospheric TDI concentrations which continue to reveal frequent excursions above the threshold limit value (TLV) of 0.02 ppm ceiling. These data are presented in relation to time and plant location. Although the first full year follow-up following initial exposure was not complete, certain preliminary clinical observations were made. A number of workers had episodes of acute respiratory symptoms related to single exposure to an irritant gas at work, usually either TDI or phosgene. It appears that two or three workers in the study population have become "clinically sensitized" to TDI and have been removed from regular TDI exposure. To date, the total number of workers who report the presence of recurring respiratory symptoms has not increased in comparison with the pre-exposure survey. Pulmonary function data after one full year of TDI exposure are not yet available. Pre- and post-shift ventilatory function studies do not indicate significant differences between the exposed and control groups. Selected individuals had carefully controlled inhalation challenge tests to monitored concentrations of TDI vapor under laboratory conditions. In workers suspected of having become "sensitized", immediate and/or late air flow obstruction was demonstrated and could be related to dose of inhaled TDI.
一家新的生产甲苯二异氰酸酯(TDI)的工厂提供了一个独特的机会,可对一组在工厂运营开始前就已接受研究的暴露工人进行TDI蒸汽吸入对呼吸健康影响的调查。为了建立剂量反应关系并确定宿主因素,在进行包括TDI大气浓度连续采样的全面环境监测计划的同时,还进行了包括肺功能和免疫学研究在内的完整生物监测。研究组包括在生产岗位定期接触TDI的工人(83名)、通常在维修岗位间歇性接触该蒸汽的工人(28名)以及在TDI区域外工作的对照组工人(55名)。对这一人群进行为期5年的跟踪。该工厂于1973年8月开始运营,10月底完成启动程序。TDI泄漏发生的原因众多,通常归因于泵故障及由此导致的管道堵塞。在装桶操作中也发生了大量暴露情况。这些故障的影响在大气TDI浓度的连续监测数据中有所体现,该数据持续显示频繁超过0.02 ppm上限的阈限值(TLV)。这些数据按时间和工厂位置呈现。尽管首次暴露后的首个完整年度随访尚未完成,但已得出某些初步临床观察结果。一些工人出现与工作中单次接触刺激性气体(通常为TDI或光气)相关的急性呼吸道症状发作。研究人群中似乎有两三名工人已对TDI产生“临床致敏”,并已不再定期接触TDI。迄今为止,与暴露前调查相比,报告有反复呼吸道症状的工人总数并未增加。TDI暴露一整年之后的肺功能数据尚未可得。班前和班后通气功能研究未显示暴露组与对照组之间存在显著差异。选定个体在实验室条件下接受了对监测的TDI蒸汽浓度进行的严格控制的吸入激发试验。在怀疑已“致敏”的工人中,证实存在即刻和/或迟发性气流阻塞,且可能与吸入的TDI剂量有关。