Avery S B, Stetson D M, Pan P M, Mathews K P
Clin Exp Immunol. 1969 May;4(5):585-96.
Thirteen subjects who experienced only the expected irritant respiratory and ocular effects from occupational exposure to toluene diisocyanate (TDI) were compared with eight workers who appeared clinically to be sensitized to this substance, as manifested by the prompt development of asthmatic symptoms on exposure to minute concentrations of TDI. In an attempt to document an immunological response to TDI in the latter group, several conjugates of TDI with human serum albumin were prepared. Gel diffusion, leucocyte histamine release, PCA in guinea-pigs, passive haemagglutination, passive transfer (P-K) and a few direct skin tests all failed to show antibodies to TDI. In lymphocyte culture, however, TDI–human serum albumin complexes produced stimulation of lymphocytes from seven of the eight subjects suspected of being sensitized and none of the controls.
将13名仅因职业接触甲苯二异氰酸酯(TDI)而出现预期刺激性呼吸道和眼部效应的受试者,与8名临床上似乎对该物质过敏的工人进行了比较,后者在接触微量TDI后迅速出现哮喘症状。为了证明后一组对TDI有免疫反应,制备了几种TDI与人血清白蛋白的结合物。凝胶扩散、白细胞组胺释放、豚鼠PCA、被动血凝、被动转移(P-K)以及一些直接皮肤试验均未显示出针对TDI的抗体。然而,在淋巴细胞培养中,TDI-人血清白蛋白复合物刺激了8名疑似过敏受试者中的7人的淋巴细胞,而对照组无人出现这种情况。