Morisky Donald E, Stein Judith A, Chiao Chi, Ksobiech Kate, Malow Robert
Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Health Psychol. 2006 Sep;25(5):595-603. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.595.
The authors assessed the relative impact of structural and social influence interventions on reducing sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV risk behavior among female sex workers in the Philippines (N = 897). Four conditions included manager influence, peer influence, combined manager-peer influence, and control. Intervention effects were assessed at the establishment level in multilevel models because of statistical dependencies among women employed within the same establishments. Control group membership predicted greater perceived risk, less condom use, less HIV/AIDS knowledge, and more negative condom attitudes. Combination participants reported more positive condom attitudes, more establishment policies favoring condom use, and fewer STIs. Manager-only participants reported fewer STIs, lower condom attitudes, less knowledge, and higher perceived risk than peer-only participants. Because interventions were implemented at the city level, baseline and follow-up city differences were analyzed to rule out intervention effects due to preexisting differences.
作者评估了结构和社会影响干预措施对降低菲律宾女性性工作者(N = 897)的性传播感染(STIs)和艾滋病毒风险行为的相对影响。四个条件包括管理者影响、同伴影响、管理者 - 同伴联合影响和对照组。由于在同一机构工作的女性之间存在统计依赖性,因此在多层次模型中在机构层面评估干预效果。对照组成员表现出更高的感知风险、更少的避孕套使用、更少的艾滋病毒/艾滋病知识以及更负面的避孕套态度。联合干预组的参与者报告了更积极的避孕套态度、更多支持使用避孕套的机构政策以及更少的性传播感染。仅接受管理者干预的参与者报告的性传播感染比仅接受同伴干预的参与者少,但避孕套态度更低、知识更少且感知风险更高。由于干预措施是在城市层面实施的,因此分析了基线和随访时城市之间的差异,以排除由于先前存在的差异导致的干预效果。