Suppr超能文献

BD Phoenix自动化微生物系统用于肠杆菌科细菌鉴定及药敏试验的评估

Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae.

作者信息

Carroll Karen C, Glanz Brian D, Borek Anita P, Burger Chad, Bhally Hasan S, Henciak Susan, Flayhart Diane

机构信息

Division of Medical Microbiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Meyer B1-193, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Oct;44(10):3506-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00994-06.

Abstract

We evaluated the accuracy of the BD Phoenix system for the identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of 251 isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae representing 31 species. Organisms were inoculated onto the Phoenix panel according to the manufacturer's instructions. The results from conventional biochemical tests were used for the reference method for ID. Agar dilution, performed according to the CLSI guidelines, was the reference AST method. Essential and categorical agreements were determined. The overall levels of agreement for the genus- and species-level identifications were 95.6% and 94.4%, respectively. Fourteen isolates were incorrectly identified by the Phoenix system; 10 of these were incorrectly identified to the species level. Three of these were Enterobacter (Pantoea) species and four of these were Shigella spp. misidentified as Escherichia coli. For AST results, the essential and categorical agreements were 98.7% and 97.9%, respectively. The very major error, major error, and minor error rates were 0.38%, 0.33%, and 1.8%, respectively. Six isolates (three E. coli isolates and three Klebsiella isolates) were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers. All six were flagged by the Phoenix system expert rules. The Phoenix system compares favorably to traditional methods for ID and AST of Enterobacteriaceae.

摘要

我们评估了BD Phoenix系统对代表31个菌种的251株肠杆菌科细菌进行鉴定(ID)和药敏试验(AST)的准确性。按照制造商的说明将细菌接种到Phoenix鉴定板上。常规生化试验结果用作ID的参考方法。根据CLSI指南进行的琼脂稀释法是AST的参考方法。确定了基本符合率和类别符合率。属水平和种水平鉴定的总体符合率分别为95.6%和94.4%。Phoenix系统错误鉴定了14株细菌;其中10株在种水平被错误鉴定。其中3株为肠杆菌(泛菌)属细菌,4株志贺菌属细菌被误鉴定为大肠杆菌。对于AST结果,基本符合率和类别符合率分别为98.7%和97.9%。极重大错误率、重大错误率和 minor error率分别为0.38%、0.33%和1.8%。6株细菌(3株大肠杆菌和3株克雷伯菌)产超广谱β-内酰胺酶。这6株均被Phoenix系统的专家规则标记。Phoenix系统在肠杆菌科细菌的ID和AST方面优于传统方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Blood culture-free ultra-rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing.血培养免培养超快速抗菌药物敏感性检测。
Nature. 2024 Aug;632(8026):893-902. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07725-1. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Rapid Drug Susceptibility Testing to Preserve Antibiotics.快速药敏检测以保护抗生素。
Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2833:129-143. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3981-8_13.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验