Suppr超能文献

奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素治疗幽门螺杆菌感染1周与2周的疗效比较:HYPER研究

Comparison of 1 and 2 weeks of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the HYPER Study.

作者信息

Zagari Rocco Maurizio, Bianchi-Porro Gabriele, Fiocca Roberto, Gasbarrini Giovanni, Roda Enrico, Bazzoli Franco

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Gut. 2007 Apr;56(4):475-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.102269. Epub 2006 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Triple therapy is recommended for Helicobacter pylori eradication, yet consensus on the duration of treatment is lacking.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of 1- and 2-week regimens of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin in a large, multicentre, double-blind and randomised study.

METHODS

A total of 909 H pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcer, enrolled in 81 endoscopy units in Italy, were randomised to receive omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for either 1 week (OAC1W) or 2 weeks (OAC2W) or omeprazole and amoxicillin for 2 weeks. H pylori eradication was assessed by histological examination and carbon-13 urea breath test 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Both the intention-to-treat (ITT; n = 907) and per protocol (PP; n = 661) analyses showed no significant differences between the eradication rates of OAC1W (ITT 79.7%; PP 83.6%) and OAC2W (ITT 81.7%; PP 84.9%; ITT p = 0.53; PP p = 0.71). Both triple omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin regimens gave significantly higher eradication rates compared with omeprazole and amoxicillin treatment (ITT 44.6%; PP 42.8%; p<0.001). Poor compliance was reported in 18.6%, 17.3% and 15.1% (p = 0.51) of patients for OAC2W, OAC1W and omeprazole and amoxicillin, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 9.9% and 9.6% (p = 0.88) of patients for OAC2W and OAC1W, respectively, and in 5.9% for omeprazole and amoxicillin (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

1-week and 2-week triple treatments for H pylori eradication are similar in terms of efficacy, safety and patient compliance.

摘要

背景

三联疗法被推荐用于根除幽门螺杆菌,但治疗疗程的共识尚缺。

目的

在一项大型、多中心、双盲随机研究中比较奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素1周与2周治疗方案的疗效和安全性。

方法

意大利81个内镜检查单位共纳入909例幽门螺杆菌阳性十二指肠溃疡患者,随机接受奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素治疗1周(OAC1W)或2周(OAC2W),或奥美拉唑和阿莫西林治疗2周。治疗4周后通过组织学检查和碳-13尿素呼气试验评估幽门螺杆菌根除情况。

结果

意向性分析(ITT;n = 907)和符合方案分析(PP;n = 661)均显示,OAC1W组(ITT 79.7%;PP 83.6%)和OAC2W组(ITT 81.7%;PP 84.9%;ITT p = 0.53;PP p = 0.71)的根除率无显著差异。与奥美拉唑和阿莫西林治疗相比(ITT 44.6%;PP 42.8%;p<0.001),两种三联疗法(奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素)的根除率均显著更高。OAC2W组、OAC1W组和奥美拉唑与阿莫西林组患者的依从性差分别为18.6%、17.3%和15.1%(p = 0.51)。OAC2W组和OAC1W组分别有9.9%和9.6%的患者发生不良事件(p = 0.88),奥美拉唑与阿莫西林组为5.9%(p = 0.11)。

结论

在疗效、安全性和患者依从性方面,1周和2周的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌相似。

相似文献

8
Concomitant, sequential, and hybrid therapy for H. pylori eradication: a pilot study.同时、序贯和混合疗法根除 H. pylori:一项初步研究。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;37(6):647-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Reevaluation of the Efficacy of First Line Regimen for .对……一线治疗方案疗效的重新评估
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 22;13:25-33. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S239343. eCollection 2020.
5
Effect of bacterial and host factors on Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.细菌和宿主因素对幽门螺杆菌根除治疗的影响。
Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2015;19(12):1637-50. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2015.1073261. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Helicobacter pylori: management in 2013.幽门螺杆菌:2013年的管理
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 14;20(18):5302-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5302.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Helicobacter pylori.幽门螺杆菌的治疗。
Helicobacter. 2005;10 Suppl 1:40-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2005.00333.x.
7
Seven-day therapy for Helicobacter pylori in the United States.美国幽门螺杆菌的七日疗法
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jul 1;20(1):99-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02029.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验