Tastekin Nurettin, Birtane Murat, Uzunca Kaan
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Medical Faculty, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.
Rheumatol Int. 2007 Mar;27(5):447-51. doi: 10.1007/s00296-006-0232-2.
Digital palpation, myalgic scoring and dolorimetry are frequently used to count tender points in fibromyalgia syndrome. We aimed to investigate the probable relation between tender points count and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire and to assess which of the tender point counting methods is the most successful in predicting the severity of the disease. Tender point areas of 36 patients with fibromyalgia syndrome were assessed with three methods which are myalgic scoring, digital and dolorimetric tender points counting methods. Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was used to measure the disease severity. The correlation between each of the assessment methods and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was investigated. The mean count of digitally evaluated tender points was 14.86 +/- 2.67 and by dolorimetry was 11.81 +/- 4.48. The mean total myalgic score was found to be 24.61 +/- 8.91. All of the tender point evaluation methods correlated positively with each other (P < 0.01). Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score was also correlated with only digital palpation tender point count of these three evaluation methods (r = 0.427, P < 0.05). Digital tender point count seemed to be sufficient for assessment, and there is no need for an additional instrument for tender point evaluation.
数字触诊、肌痛评分和痛觉测量法常用于计算纤维肌痛综合征中的压痛点。我们旨在研究压痛点计数与纤维肌痛影响问卷之间可能存在的关系,并评估哪种压痛点计数方法在预测疾病严重程度方面最为成功。采用肌痛评分、数字和痛觉测量压痛点计数这三种方法,对36例纤维肌痛综合征患者的压痛点区域进行评估。使用纤维肌痛影响问卷来衡量疾病严重程度。研究了每种评估方法与纤维肌痛影响问卷之间的相关性。数字评估压痛点的平均计数为14.86±2.67,痛觉测量法的平均计数为11.81±4.48。肌痛总平均分被发现为24.61±8.91。所有压痛点评估方法之间均呈正相关(P<0.01)。在这三种评估方法中,纤维肌痛影响问卷评分也仅与数字触诊压痛点计数相关(r=0.427,P<0.05)。数字压痛点计数似乎足以进行评估,无需额外的工具来评估压痛点。