Suppr超能文献

三种不同的压痛点评估方法中,哪一种对预测纤维肌痛综合征的严重程度更有用?

Which of the three different tender points assessment methods is more useful for predicting the severity of fibromyalgia syndrome?

作者信息

Tastekin Nurettin, Birtane Murat, Uzunca Kaan

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Medical Faculty, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2007 Mar;27(5):447-51. doi: 10.1007/s00296-006-0232-2.

Abstract

Digital palpation, myalgic scoring and dolorimetry are frequently used to count tender points in fibromyalgia syndrome. We aimed to investigate the probable relation between tender points count and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire and to assess which of the tender point counting methods is the most successful in predicting the severity of the disease. Tender point areas of 36 patients with fibromyalgia syndrome were assessed with three methods which are myalgic scoring, digital and dolorimetric tender points counting methods. Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was used to measure the disease severity. The correlation between each of the assessment methods and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was investigated. The mean count of digitally evaluated tender points was 14.86 +/- 2.67 and by dolorimetry was 11.81 +/- 4.48. The mean total myalgic score was found to be 24.61 +/- 8.91. All of the tender point evaluation methods correlated positively with each other (P < 0.01). Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score was also correlated with only digital palpation tender point count of these three evaluation methods (r = 0.427, P < 0.05). Digital tender point count seemed to be sufficient for assessment, and there is no need for an additional instrument for tender point evaluation.

摘要

数字触诊、肌痛评分和痛觉测量法常用于计算纤维肌痛综合征中的压痛点。我们旨在研究压痛点计数与纤维肌痛影响问卷之间可能存在的关系,并评估哪种压痛点计数方法在预测疾病严重程度方面最为成功。采用肌痛评分、数字和痛觉测量压痛点计数这三种方法,对36例纤维肌痛综合征患者的压痛点区域进行评估。使用纤维肌痛影响问卷来衡量疾病严重程度。研究了每种评估方法与纤维肌痛影响问卷之间的相关性。数字评估压痛点的平均计数为14.86±2.67,痛觉测量法的平均计数为11.81±4.48。肌痛总平均分被发现为24.61±8.91。所有压痛点评估方法之间均呈正相关(P<0.01)。在这三种评估方法中,纤维肌痛影响问卷评分也仅与数字触诊压痛点计数相关(r=0.427,P<0.05)。数字压痛点计数似乎足以进行评估,无需额外的工具来评估压痛点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验