Mikszta John A, Dekker John P, Harvey Noel G, Dean Cheryl H, Brittingham John M, Huang Joanne, Sullivan Vincent J, Dyas Beverly, Roy Chad J, Ulrich Robert G
BD Technologies, 21 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Infect Immun. 2006 Dec;74(12):6806-10. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01210-06. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
The recombinant protective antigen (rPA) of Bacillus anthracis is a promising anthrax vaccine. We compared serum immunoglobulin G levels and toxin-neutralizing antibody titers in rabbits following delivery of various doses of vaccine by microneedle-based intradermal (i.d.) delivery or intramuscular (i.m.) injection using conventional needles. Intradermal delivery required less antigen to induce levels of antibody similar to those produced via i.m. injection during the first 2 weeks following primary and booster inoculation. This dose-sparing effect was less evident at the later stages of the immune response. Rabbits immunized i.d. with 10 mug of rPA displayed 100% protection from aerosol spore challenge, while i.m. injection of the same dose provided slightly lower protection (71%). Groups immunized with lower antigen doses were partially protected (13 to 29%) regardless of the mode of administration. Overall, our results suggest rPA formulated with aluminum adjuvant and administered to the skin by a microneedle-based device is as efficacious as i.m. vaccination.
炭疽芽孢杆菌重组保护性抗原(rPA)是一种很有前景的炭疽疫苗。我们比较了通过基于微针的皮内(i.d.)接种或使用传统针头进行肌肉内(i.m.)注射给予不同剂量疫苗后,家兔血清免疫球蛋白G水平和毒素中和抗体滴度。在初次和加强接种后的前2周内,皮内接种诱导产生与肌肉注射相似抗体水平所需的抗原量更少。这种节省剂量的效果在免疫反应后期不太明显。用10μg rPA进行皮内免疫的家兔对气溶胶孢子攻击显示出100%的保护作用,而肌肉注射相同剂量的保护作用略低(71%)。无论给药方式如何,用较低抗原剂量免疫的组均得到部分保护(13%至29%)。总体而言,我们的结果表明,用铝佐剂配制并通过基于微针的装置给予皮肤的rPA与肌肉注射疫苗一样有效。