Yih-Shiunn Lee, Chien-Rae Huang, Wen-Yun Liao
Taipei City Hospital, Heping Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.
Int Orthop. 2007 Oct;31(5):677-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0243-3. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
The study was a retrospective evaluation and comparison. Eighty-four elderly patients (> 60 years) with undisplaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures were treated with osteosynthesis with either dynamic hip screws (DHS) or multiple cannulated screws (MCS). The Singh index was used to evaluate bone quality. All patients were followed up retrospectively for at least 12 months. The clinical results were compared between the DHS and MCS groups. Both groups were similar in respect of injury mechanisms, mean Singh index, injury-surgery interval, gender and age (all p values > or = 0.29). The MCS group had significantly smaller wound incisions, less haemoglobin level drops, lower blood transfusion rates and shorter hospital stays than the DHS group (all p values < or = 0.008). However, the DHS group had a higher rate of overall success when compared to the MCS group (97.5% versus 84.1%, p=0.04). In conclusion, although DHS fixation requires a larger skin incision and more soft tissue dissection, its use in elderly patients with osteoporosis is recommended due to simple, efficacy and high overall success rate.
本研究为回顾性评估与比较。84例60岁以上无移位的股骨颈囊内骨折老年患者接受了动力髋螺钉(DHS)或多枚空心螺钉(MCS)内固定治疗。采用辛格指数评估骨质。所有患者均进行了至少12个月的回顾性随访。比较了DHS组和MCS组的临床结果。两组在损伤机制、平均辛格指数、受伤至手术间隔时间、性别和年龄方面均相似(所有p值≥0.29)。与DHS组相比,MCS组的手术切口明显更小、血红蛋白水平下降更少、输血率更低且住院时间更短(所有p值≤0.008)。然而,与MCS组相比,DHS组的总体成功率更高(97.5%对84.1%,p = 0.04)。总之,尽管DHS固定需要更大的皮肤切口和更多的软组织剥离,但由于其操作简单、疗效好且总体成功率高,建议在骨质疏松的老年患者中使用。