Schrader H, Stovner L J, Obelieniene D, Surkiene D, Mickeviciene D, Bovim G, Sand T
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Eur J Neurol. 2006 Nov;13(11):1226-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01481.x.
Acute and chronic headache attributed to whiplash injury are new diagnostic entities in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition. A main objective of the present study was to assess the validity of these nosologic entities by studying the headache pattern in an inception cohort of 210 rear-end car collision victims and in 210 matched controls. Consecutive drivers involved in rear-end collisions were identified from the daily records of the Traffic Police Department of Kaunas, Lithuania. A standard self-report questionnaire was sent to the drivers between 2 and 7 days after the collision, and their passengers were recruited as well. Headache and neck pain were evaluated within 7 days of the collision, at 2 months and 1 year after the collision. A control group of non-traumatized subjects received questionnaires at the time of the selection and 1 year later. Of the 75 collision victims who developed headache within the first 7 days of the collision, 37 had a clinical picture in accordance with the criteria for acute whiplash headache (i.e., concomitant neck pain) and 38 did not. For acute headache after collision, concomitant neck pain was of no relevance to the headache type or its course. In both these subgroups, migraine and tension-type headache could be diagnosed in similar proportions and the prognosis after 2 months and 1 year was also similar. Preexisting headache was a strong prognostic factor in both groups for both acute and chronic pain. Compared with the non-traumatized control group, the 1-year incidence of new or worsened headache, or of headache improvement, was the same. A likely interpretation of the data is that acute headaches after rear-end car collisions mainly represent episodes of a primary headache precipitated by the stress of the situation. We conclude that the nosologic validity of both acute and chronic whiplash headache is poor as the headaches, in accordance with the criteria lack distinguishing clinical features and have the same prognosis compared with headaches in a control group.
归因于挥鞭样损伤的急性和慢性头痛是《国际头痛疾病分类》第二版中的新诊断实体。本研究的一个主要目的是通过研究210名追尾汽车碰撞受害者起始队列以及210名匹配对照者的头痛模式,来评估这些疾病分类实体的有效性。从立陶宛考纳斯市交警部门的日常记录中识别出连续参与追尾碰撞的司机。在碰撞后2至7天向司机发送标准的自我报告问卷,并招募他们的乘客。在碰撞后7天内、2个月和1年后对头痛和颈部疼痛进行评估。一组未受创伤的对照组在入选时和1年后接受问卷调查。在碰撞后前7天内出现头痛的75名碰撞受害者中,37人有符合急性挥鞭样头痛标准的临床表现(即伴有颈部疼痛),38人则没有。对于碰撞后的急性头痛,伴有颈部疼痛与头痛类型或病程无关。在这两个亚组中,偏头痛和紧张型头痛的诊断比例相似,2个月和1年后的预后也相似。既往头痛是两组急性和慢性疼痛的一个强有力的预后因素。与未受创伤的对照组相比,新出现或加重的头痛、或头痛改善的1年发生率相同。对这些数据的一种可能解释是,追尾汽车碰撞后的急性头痛主要代表由该情况的压力引发的原发性头痛发作。我们得出结论,急性和慢性挥鞭样头痛的疾病分类有效性较差,因为根据标准,这些头痛缺乏独特的临床特征,与对照组的头痛相比预后相同。