Lee Choonik, Lee Choonsik, Shah Amish P, Bolch Wesley E
Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8300, USA.
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Nov 7;51(21):5391-407. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/21/001. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
The rather complex and microscopic histological structure of the skeletal system generally limits one's ability to accurately model this tissue during dosimetric evaluations. Consequently, various assumptions must be made to evaluate the absorbed dose from external and internal photons to the radiosensitive tissues of the red (or haematopoietically active) bone marrow and the osteogenic tissues of the skeletal endosteum. These various methods for photon skeletal dosimetry have not been inter-compared, partly due to the lack of a realistic reference model that can provide a high-resolution three-dimensional geometry for secondary electron particle transport. In the present study, the paired-image radiation transport (PIRT) model developed by Shah et al (2005 J. Nucl. Med. 45 344) was utilized to evaluate the absorbed dose per incident photon fluence to these skeletal regions from idealized parallel beams of monoenergetic photons. The PIRT model results were then used as a local reference against which absorbed doses via other methods were compared. For red bone marrow dosimetry, four approximate techniques were considered: (1) the dose response function method (DRF method) presented in ORNL/TM-8381, (2) the mass-energy absorption coefficient ratio method (two-parameter MEAC method), (3) the MEAC method with the additional use of energy-dependent dose enhancement factors from King and Spiers (1985 Br. J. Radiol. 58 345) (three-parameter MEAC method), and (4) the three-parameter MEAC method applied at the voxel level through the use image-specific CT numbers (CTN method). For the bone endosteum (i.e., bone surfaces), two approximate techniques were compared: (1) the DRF method for bone surfaces and (2) the homogeneous bone approximation (HBA) method. In each case, the local reference standard was assumed to be that of the PIRT model. Four different ex vivo bone specimens with distinctively different internal structures were used in the study: the cranium, the lumbar vertebra, the os coxae and the left middle rib, each excised from a 66 year male cadaver (body mass index, 22.7 kg m(-2)). High-resolution CT images of these skeletal sites were used to construct computational voxel models for Monte Carlo radiation transport. Study results indicated that skeletal sites with thick cortical regions and thick trabeculae such as in the cranium provide considerable beam attenuation at low photon energies, which is not properly accounted for in methods based on a homogeneous skeletal tissue structure (DRF, MEAC, HBA). For bone marrow dose assessment, the CTN method showed the best agreement with PIRT model results over a broad range of photon energies, while the HBA method showed better agreement with the PIRT model in assessing bone endosteum dose at energies above 100 keV. Bone surface doses were better approximately by the DRF method at energies below 50 keV. Considerable secondary electron escape at photon energies over 1-3 MeV were accounted for in RBM dose assessment only in the PIRT model, as the other methods presume either an infinite expanse of spongiosa (DRF) or the existence of charge-particle equilibrium (MEAC, CTN).
骨骼系统相当复杂且微观的组织结构通常会限制人们在剂量学评估期间精确模拟该组织的能力。因此,必须做出各种假设,以评估从外部和内部光子到红(或造血活跃)骨髓的放射敏感组织以及骨骼内膜的成骨组织的吸收剂量。这些用于光子骨骼剂量测定的各种方法尚未相互比较,部分原因是缺乏一个能够为二次电子粒子传输提供高分辨率三维几何结构的现实参考模型。在本研究中,利用Shah等人(2005年,《核医学杂志》45卷,344页)开发的配对图像辐射传输(PIRT)模型,来评估来自理想化单能光子平行束对这些骨骼区域每入射光子注量的吸收剂量。然后将PIRT模型结果用作局部参考,与通过其他方法得到的吸收剂量进行比较。对于红骨髓剂量测定,考虑了四种近似技术:(1)橡树岭国家实验室报告ORNL/TM - 8381中提出的剂量响应函数法(DRF法),(2)质能吸收系数比法(双参数MEAC法),(3)额外使用King和Spiers(1985年,《英国放射学杂志》58卷,345页)的能量相关剂量增强因子的MEAC法(三参数MEAC法),以及(4)通过使用特定图像的CT值在体素水平应用的三参数MEAC法(CTN法)。对于骨内膜(即骨表面),比较了两种近似技术:(1)骨表面的DRF法和(2)均匀骨近似(HBA)法。在每种情况下,局部参考标准都假定为PIRT模型的标准。本研究使用了四个具有明显不同内部结构的离体骨标本:颅骨、腰椎、髋骨和左中肋骨,每个标本均取自一名66岁男性尸体(体重指数,22.7 kg·m⁻²)。这些骨骼部位的高分辨率CT图像用于构建用于蒙特卡罗辐射传输的计算体素模型。研究结果表明,在低光子能量下,颅骨等具有厚皮质区域和厚小梁的骨骼部位会提供相当大的束衰减,这在基于均匀骨骼组织结构的方法(DRF、MEAC、HBA)中没有得到适当考虑。对于骨髓剂量评估,CTN法在很宽的光子能量范围内与PIRT模型结果显示出最佳一致性,而HBA法在评估能量高于100 keV时的骨内膜剂量方面与PIRT模型显示出更好的一致性。在能量低于50 keV时,DRF法对骨表面剂量的近似效果更好。在1 - 3 MeV以上的光子能量下,只有PIRT模型在红骨髓剂量评估中考虑了相当数量的二次电子逸出,因为其他方法要么假定有无限大的海绵状骨(DRF),要么假定存在带电粒子平衡(MEAC、CTN)。