• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜阑尾切除术。现状。ABC医疗中心过去五年的经验]

[Laparoscopic appendectomy. Present situation. ABC medical center experience during the last five years].

作者信息

Spaventa Ibarrola Antonio, Decanini Terán César, Becerril Martínez Guillermo, González Lazzeri Sergio, Menéndez Skertchly Ana, Gaertner Wolff Wolfgang, Arias Gutiérrez Alfonso, Hernández Vera Francisco, Arriola Sánchez Jorge, Golffier Rosete Claudio

机构信息

Departamento de Cirugía Endoscópica, The American British Cowdray Medical Center I. A. P México, DF.

出版信息

Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2006 Jan-Mar;71(1):31-8.

PMID:17063572
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy.

BACKGROUND DATA

Appendectomy is the treatment of choice for acute appendicitis. Open Appendectomy (OA) has its complications rates (10-20%) and negative explorations in young women are about 25-30%. Acute appendicitis has a 3.1% morbidity and with perforation up to 47.2% and a mortality rate less than 1%. Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been shown in many studies with lower intraoperatory and postoperatory complications, less hospitalization days, lower pain and faster return to daily activities when its compared with OA.

METHODS

We perform a retrospective and descriptive trial with 1,883 patients with acute appendicitis between January 2000 to September 2004. Patients smaller than 15 years old and with other postoperatory diagnosis were excluded. Ji2 and t Student statistic tests were performed.

RESULTS

We obtained 1,272 patients with acute appendicitis, 49% male and 51% female. LA was performed in 732 patients, 46.1% male and 53.9% female and OA was performed in 541 patients, 52.6% male and 47.3% female. Similar midage patients in both groups. LS was performed in 180 patients with complicated appendicitis and 116 patients by OA. LA was converted to open surgery in 4.5% patients. Morbidity was lower for laparoscopic group with statistical difference. There were no difference in fasting and hospitalization days.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure is a good choice for differential diagnosis overall in young women and complicated appendicitis with lower morbidity than the OA.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的诊断及治疗准确性。

背景资料

阑尾切除术是急性阑尾炎的首选治疗方法。开腹阑尾切除术(OA)有其并发症发生率(10 - 20%),年轻女性的阴性探查率约为25 - 30%。急性阑尾炎的发病率为3.1%,穿孔时高达47.2%,死亡率低于1%。与OA相比,多项研究已表明腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)具有术中及术后并发症更低、住院天数更少、疼痛更轻且能更快恢复日常活动等优势。

方法

我们对2000年1月至2004年9月期间1883例急性阑尾炎患者进行了一项回顾性描述性试验。排除15岁以下患者及有其他术后诊断的患者。进行了t检验和F检验。

结果

我们纳入了1272例急性阑尾炎患者,男性占49%,女性占51%。732例患者接受了LA,其中男性占46.1%,女性占53.9%;541例患者接受了OA,其中男性占52.6%,女性占47.3%。两组患者的年龄中位数相似。180例复杂性阑尾炎患者接受了LA,116例接受了OA。4.5%的LA患者转为开腹手术。腹腔镜组的发病率较低,有统计学差异。禁食天数和住院天数无差异。

结论

总体而言,对于年轻女性及复杂性阑尾炎,该手术是鉴别诊断的良好选择,其发病率低于OA。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic appendectomy. Present situation. ABC medical center experience during the last five years].[腹腔镜阑尾切除术。现状。ABC医疗中心过去五年的经验]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2006 Jan-Mar;71(1):31-8.
2
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
3
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
5
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
6
Comparison between open and laparoscopic appendectomy in non-complicated appendicitis.非复杂性阑尾炎的开腹阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较。
Bol Asoc Med P R. 2008 Jan-Mar;100(1):20-5.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice?小儿单纯性及穿孔性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:是首选术式吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Nov;35(11):1582-5. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.18319.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.
9
Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: retrospective assessment of 200 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:200例患者的回顾性评估
Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):178-82.
10
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.