Estle Sara J, Green Leonard, Myerson Joel, Holt Daniel D
Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):914-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03193437.
In four experiments, we compared the effects of delay, probability, and monetary amount on the subjective value of gains and losses. For delayed gains, smaller amounts were discounted more steeply than larger amounts, whereas the opposite pattern was observed with probabilistic gains. For both delayed and probabilistic losses, however, amount had much smaller and less reliable effects on discounting. Taken together, the pattern of differential magnitude effects leads to delayed gains' being discounted significantly more steeply than delayed losses, but only at smaller amounts, whereas probabilistic gains are discounted significantly more steeply than probabilistic losses, but only at larger amounts. Even though the same hyperbola-like function described both individual and group discounting of delayed and probabilistic gains and losses, the present findings suggest that different processes are involved in discounting positive and negative outcomes. Raw data may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.
在四项实验中,我们比较了延迟、概率和货币金额对收益和损失主观价值的影响。对于延迟收益,较小金额的折扣幅度比较大金额的更大,而对于概率性收益则观察到相反的模式。然而,对于延迟和概率性损失,金额对折扣的影响要小得多且不太可靠。综合来看,不同幅度效应的模式导致延迟收益的折扣幅度显著大于延迟损失,但仅在较小金额时如此,而概率性收益的折扣幅度显著大于概率性损失,但仅在较大金额时如此。尽管相同的双曲线样函数描述了个体和群体对延迟和概率性收益及损失的折扣,但目前的研究结果表明,对积极和消极结果进行折扣涉及不同的过程。原始数据可从www.psychonomic.org/archive下载。