Pantazis Georgios, Tsitsopoulos Parmenion, Mihas Constantinos, Katsiva Vasiliki, Stavrianos Vasilios, Zymaris Stylianos
Department of Neurosurgery, Thriassio General Hospital, 19600 Magoula, Athens, Greece.
Surg Neurol. 2006 Nov;66(5):492-501; discussion 501-2. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.05.054.
Treatment of primary SICH is still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of craniotomy and early hematoma evacuation vs nonoperative management in patients with SICH.
A prospective randomized study of craniotomy and early hematoma removal vs best medical management was performed in 108 patients with primary SICH. Surgical or medical treatment was initiated within 8 hours post ictus. Principal eligibility criterium was the presence of neurologic impairment associated with a spontaneous subcortical or putaminal hemorrhage bigger than 30 mL. Outcomes were assessed at 1 year post ictus.
Analysis of outcome revealed a significantly higher percentage of GOS scores higher than 3 for the surgical patients, compared with those of the conservative group (33% and 9%, respectively; P < .05). By contrast, the mortality rates between operated and conservatively managed patients did not differ significantly. The main prognostic variables were the initial neurologic status, hematoma volume, and location. Stratifications of these parameters and analysis showed that the positive effect of surgery on the quality of survival was statistically not valid for patients with GCS scores lower than 8 or ICH volumes 80 mL or higher at the time of enrollment.
The study demonstrates that surgical patients with subcortical or putaminal hematomas showed better functional results than their conservatively treated counterparts. However, early ICH evacuation failed to improve the survival rates, as compared with best medical management.
原发性脑出血的治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨开颅手术及早期血肿清除术与非手术治疗对脑出血患者的疗效。
对108例原发性脑出血患者进行了一项关于开颅手术及早期血肿清除术与最佳药物治疗的前瞻性随机研究。在发病后8小时内开始手术或药物治疗。主要入选标准为存在与自发性皮质下或壳核出血大于30 mL相关的神经功能损害。在发病后1年评估预后。
结果分析显示,与保守治疗组相比,手术患者格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)高于3分的比例显著更高(分别为33%和9%;P <.05)。相比之下,手术治疗患者与保守治疗患者的死亡率无显著差异。主要预后变量为初始神经状态、血肿体积和位置。对这些参数进行分层和分析表明,对于入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)低于8分或脑出血体积80 mL及以上的患者,手术对生存质量的积极影响在统计学上无效。
该研究表明,患有皮质下或壳核血肿的手术患者比接受保守治疗的患者功能预后更好。然而,与最佳药物治疗相比,早期脑出血清除术未能提高生存率。