Suppr超能文献

间歇性跑步期间肠道温度的有效性和可靠性。

The validity and reliability of intestinal temperature during intermittent running.

作者信息

Gant Nicholas, Atkinson Greg, Williams Clyde

机构信息

School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Nov;38(11):1926-31. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000233800.69776.ef.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In many sporting and occupational settings, measuring core temperature using invasive methods is not practical. In these circumstances, ingestible temperature sensor capsules are a promising alternative. To date, no researcher has investigated the validity of intestinal temperature (T(int)) during free running or examined the between-trial reproducibility of this technique. Therefore, in two investigations, we examined the validity and reliability of Tint during prolonged intermittent shuttle running.

METHODS

In investigation A, 10 male games players completed 60 min of exercise while their rectal temperature (T(rec)) and T(int) were monitored. In investigation B, Tint was measured while nine males undertook two 90-min bouts of exercise, separated by 7 d.

RESULTS

A mean systematic bias of -0.15 degrees C (95% CI, 0.10-0.20) was found between T(int) and T(rec) during exercise. This bias for T(int) to record higher temperatures than T(rec) was uniform through the range of measurements, such that the exercise-mediated changes in body temperature were similar between methods of measurement. The 95% limits of agreement were found to be +/- 0.22 degrees C (95% CI, 0.11-0.33) and correlations were high (r > 0.85), suggesting that random error between methods was acceptably small. In investigation B, the mean change between repeated trials was a negligible 0.01 degrees C (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.05). The within-subjects SD was 0.08 degrees C (95% CI, 0.05-0.15). Random error was uniform through the measurement range and was deemed acceptable on the basis of statistical power calculations.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the test-retest variability of Tint is acceptably small during intermittent shuttle running. The small amount of random measurement error and similar thermal responses to exercise suggest that Tint is as appropriate for use in exercise physiology research as T(rec), provided that the consistent bias between these measurement methods is allowed for.

摘要

目的

在许多体育和职业场景中,使用侵入性方法测量核心体温并不实际。在这些情况下,可摄入式温度传感器胶囊是一种很有前景的替代方法。迄今为止,尚无研究人员调查自由活动期间肠道温度(T(int))的有效性,或检验该技术在不同试验间的可重复性。因此,在两项研究中,我们检验了长时间间歇性穿梭跑期间T(int)的有效性和可靠性。

方法

在研究A中,10名男性运动员完成60分钟的运动,同时监测他们的直肠温度(T(rec))和T(int)。在研究B中,9名男性进行两次90分钟的运动,中间间隔7天,期间测量T(int)。

结果

运动期间,T(int)和T(rec)之间的平均系统偏差为-0.15℃(95%可信区间,0.10 - 0.20)。在整个测量范围内,T(int)记录的温度高于T(rec)的这种偏差是一致的,因此两种测量方法之间运动介导的体温变化相似。一致性界限的95%为±0.22℃(95%可信区间,0.11 - 0.33),相关性很高(r > 0.85),这表明两种方法之间的随机误差小到可以接受。在研究B中,重复试验之间的平均变化微不足道,为0.01℃(95%可信区间,-0.02至0.05)。受试者内标准差为0.08℃(9�%可信区间,0.05 - 0.15)。随机误差在整个测量范围内是一致的,基于统计功效计算被认为是可以接受的。

结论

这些发现表明,在间歇性穿梭跑期间,T(int)的重测变异性小到可以接受。少量的随机测量误差以及对运动相似的热反应表明,只要考虑到这两种测量方法之间一致的偏差,T(int)在运动生理学研究中的适用性与T(rec)相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验