Suppr超能文献

正面碰撞中四点式安全带系统的生物力学

Biomechanics of 4-point seat belt systems in frontal impacts.

作者信息

Rouhana Stephen W, Bedewi Paul G, Kankanala Sundeep V, Prasad Priya, Zwolinski Joseph J, Meduvsky Alex G, Rupp Jonathan D, Jeffreys Thomas A, Schneider Lawrence W

机构信息

Ford Motor Company.

出版信息

Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:367-99. doi: 10.4271/2003-22-0017.

Abstract

The biomechanical behavior of 4-point seat belt systems was investigated through MADYMO modeling, dummy tests and post mortem human subject tests. This study was conducted to assess the effect of 4-point seat belts on the risk of thoracic injury in frontal impacts, to evaluate the ability to prevent submarining under the lap belt using 4-point seat belts, and to examine whether 4-point belts may induce injuries not typically observed with 3-point seat belts. The performance of two types of 4-point seat belts was compared with that of a pretensioned, load-limited, 3-point seat belt. A 3-point belt with an extra shoulder belt that "crisscrossed" the chest (X4) appeared to add constraint to the torso and increased chest deflection and injury risk. Harness style shoulder belts (V4) loaded the body in a different biomechanical manner than 3-point and X4 belts. The V4 belt appeared to shift load to the clavicles and pelvis and to reduce traction of the shoulder belt across the chest, resulting in a reduction in chest deflection by a factor of two. This is associated with a 5 to 500-fold reduction in thoracic injury risk, depending on whether one assumes 4-point belts apply concentrated or distributed load. In four of six post mortem human subjects restrained by V4 belts during 40 km/h sled tests, chest compression was zero or negative and rib fractures were nearly eliminated. Submarining was not observed in any test with post mortem human subjects. Though lumbar, sacral and pelvic injuries were noted, they are believed to be due to the artificial restraint environment (no knee bolsters, instrument panels, steering systems or airbags). While they show significant potential to reduce thoracic injury risk, there are still many issues to be resolved before 4-point belts can be considered for production vehicles. These issues include, among others, potential effects on hard and soft neck tissues, of interaction with inboard shoulder belts in farside impacts and potential effects on the fetus of latch/buckle junctions at the centerline of pregnant occupants. Work continues at Ford Motor Company to resolve these issues.

摘要

通过MADYMO建模、假人测试和尸体人体试验,对四点式安全带系统的生物力学行为进行了研究。开展这项研究是为了评估四点式安全带对正面碰撞中胸部受伤风险的影响,评估使用四点式安全带防止身体在腰部安全带下方下滑的能力,并研究四点式安全带是否会导致三点式安全带通常不会出现的损伤。将两种类型的四点式安全带的性能与一种预紧式、限力三点式安全带的性能进行了比较。一种带有额外肩带且肩带“交叉”胸部的三点式安全带(X4)似乎增加了对躯干的约束,增加了胸部变形和受伤风险。背带式肩带(V4)以与三点式和X4安全带不同的生物力学方式加载身体。V4安全带似乎将负荷转移到锁骨和骨盆,并减少肩带在胸部的拉力,导致胸部变形减少一半。这与胸部受伤风险降低5至500倍相关,具体取决于假设四点式安全带施加的是集中负荷还是分布负荷。在40公里/小时的雪橇试验中,六名使用V4安全带约束的尸体人体试验对象中有四名,胸部压缩为零或为负,肋骨骨折几乎消除。在任何尸体人体试验中均未观察到身体下滑。虽然注意到有腰椎、骶骨和骨盆损伤,但据信这是由于人工约束环境(没有膝垫、仪表板、转向系统或安全气囊)所致。虽然它们显示出显著降低胸部受伤风险的潜力,但在四点式安全带可被考虑用于量产车辆之前,仍有许多问题需要解决。这些问题包括,除其他外,对硬颈和软颈组织的潜在影响、在远侧碰撞中与内侧肩带的相互作用以及对怀孕乘客中心线处锁扣/搭扣连接对胎儿的潜在影响。福特汽车公司正在继续努力解决这些问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验