Kent Richard, Trowbridge Matthew, Lopez-Valdes Francisco J, Ordoyo Rafael Heredero, Segui-Gomez Maria
Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, U.S.A.
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009 Oct;53:41-50.
Crash protection for an aging population is one of the primary drivers of contemporary passive safety research, yet estimates of the potential benefit of age-optimized systems have not been reported. This study estimates the number killed and injured in traffic crashes due to the age-related reduction in tolerance to loading. A risk-saturation model is developed and calibrated using 2000-2007 data for the age distribution of crash-involved adult occupants and drivers and the number of those injured and killed in 2006. Nonlinear functions describing the relationships between age and risk, adjusted for several confounders are developed using 10 years of NASS-CDS data and considered along with published risk functions for both mortality and injury. The numbers killed and injured as a result of age-related fragility and frailty are determined by setting the risk at all ages equal to the risk at age 20 (i.e., risk is assumed to "saturate" at age 20). The analysis shows that risk saturation at age 20 corresponds to 7,805-14,939 fewer driver deaths and 10,989-21,132 fewer deaths to all occupants. Furthermore, 1.13-1.32 million fewer occupants would be injured (0.80-0.93 million fewer drivers) per year. In other words, that number of deaths and injuries can be attributed to age-related reductions in loading tolerance. As the age of risk saturation increases, the benefit decreases, but remains substantial even in the age regime typically considered "elderly". For example, risk saturation at age 60 corresponds to 1,011-3,577 fewer deaths and 73,537-179,396 fewer injured occupants per year. The benefit of risk saturation is nearly log-linear up to approximately age 70, but drops off quickly thereafter due to the low exposures in the oldest age range. The key contribution of this study is the quantification of deaths and injuries that can be attributed to aging and the development of functions describing the relationship between age of risk saturation and the number of deaths and injuries averted.
为老龄人口提供碰撞保护是当代被动安全研究的主要驱动力之一,但尚未有关于年龄优化系统潜在益处的估计报告。本研究估计了由于与年龄相关的负荷耐受性降低而在交通事故中死亡和受伤的人数。使用2000 - 2007年涉及碰撞的成年乘客和驾驶员的年龄分布数据以及2006年的伤亡人数,开发并校准了一个风险饱和模型。利用10年的国家汽车抽样系统 - 碰撞数据系统(NASS - CDS)数据,开发了描述年龄与风险之间关系的非线性函数,并对几个混杂因素进行了调整,同时结合已发表的死亡率和受伤风险函数进行考虑。通过将所有年龄的风险设定为等于20岁时的风险(即假设风险在20岁时“饱和”),确定了由于与年龄相关的脆弱性和虚弱导致的死亡和受伤人数。分析表明,20岁时的风险饱和对应着驾驶员死亡人数减少7805 - 14939人,所有乘客死亡人数减少10989 - 21132人。此外,每年受伤的乘客将减少113万 - 132万(驾驶员减少80万 - 93万)。换句话说,该死亡和受伤人数可归因于与年龄相关的负荷耐受性降低。随着风险饱和年龄的增加,益处会减少,但即使在通常被认为是“老年人”的年龄范围内,益处仍然很大。例如,60岁时的风险饱和对应着每年死亡人数减少1011 - 3577人,受伤乘客减少73537 - 179396人。风险饱和的益处直到大约70岁时几乎呈对数线性,但此后由于最年长者的暴露率较低而迅速下降。本研究的关键贡献在于量化了可归因于衰老的死亡和受伤人数,并开发了描述风险饱和年龄与避免的死亡和受伤人数之间关系的函数。