Spies-Dorgelo Marinda N, Terwee Caroline B, Stalman Wim A B, van der Windt Daniëlle A W M
Department of General Practice, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Nov 10;4:87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-87.
To determine the clinimetric properties of two questionnaires assessing symptoms (Symptom Severity Scale) and physical functioning (hand and finger function subscale of the AIMS2) in a Dutch primary care population.
The first 84 participants in a 1-year follow-up study on the diagnosis and prognosis of hand and wrist problems completed the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 twice within 1 to 2 weeks. The data were used to assess test-retest reliability (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC, based on the standard error of measurement (SEM)). To assess responsiveness, changes in scores between baseline and the 3 month follow-up were related to an external criterion to estimate the minimal important change (MIC). We calculated the group size needed to detect the MIC beyond measurement error.
The ICC for the Symptom Severity Scale was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54-0.78). The SDC was 1.00 at individual level and 0.11 at group level, both on a 5-point scale. The MIC was 0.23, exceeding the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 19 for the Symptom Severity Scale. The ICC for the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47-0.74). The SDC was 3.80 at individual level and 0.42 at group level, both on an 11-point scale. The MIC was 0.31, which was less than the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 150.
In our heterogeneous primary care population the Symptom Severity Scale was found to be a suitable instrument to assess the severity of symptoms, whereas the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was less suitable for the measurement of physical functioning in patients with hand and wrist problems.
确定两份问卷在荷兰初级保健人群中评估症状(症状严重程度量表)和身体功能(AIMS2的手和手指功能子量表)的测量学特性。
一项关于手和腕部问题诊断与预后的1年随访研究中的前84名参与者在1至2周内两次完成症状严重程度量表和荷兰版AIMS2的手和手指功能子量表。数据用于评估重测信度(ICC)和最小可检测变化(SDC,基于测量标准误差(SEM))。为评估反应度,将基线与3个月随访之间的得分变化与外部标准相关联,以估计最小重要变化(MIC)。我们计算了检测超出测量误差的MIC所需的样本量。
症状严重程度量表的ICC为0.68(95%CI:0.54 - 0.78)。在5分制量表上,个体水平的SDC为1.00,群体水平为0.11。MIC为·0.23,超过了群体水平的SDC。检测超出测量误差的MIC所需的症状严重程度量表样本量为19。荷兰版AIMS2的手和手指功能子量表的ICC为0.62(95%CI:0.47 - 0.74)。在11分制量表上,个体水平的SDC为3.80,群体水平为0.42。MIC为0.31,小于群体水平的SDC。检测超出测量误差的MIC所需的样本量为150。
在我们异质性的初级保健人群中,发现症状严重程度量表是评估症状严重程度的合适工具,而荷兰版AIMS2的手和手指功能子量表不太适合测量手和腕部问题患者的身体功能。