Ahrens Courtney E
Department of Psychology, California State University at Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90840, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Dec;38(3-4):263-74. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9069-9.
Rape survivors who speak out about their assault experiences are often punished for doing so when they are subjected to negative reactions from support providers. These negative reactions may thereby serve a silencing function, leading some rape survivors to stop talking about their experiences to anyone at all. The current study sought to examine this worst case scenario. Focusing on the qualitative narratives of eight rape survivors who initially disclosed the assault but then stopped disclosing for a significant period of time, this study sought to provide an in-depth description of how negative reactions silenced these survivors. Three routes to silence were identified: 1) negative reactions from professionals led survivors to question whether future disclosures would be effective; 2) negative reactions from friends and family reinforced feelings of self-blame; and 3) negative reactions from either source reinforced uncertainty about whether their experiences qualified as rape. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
那些公开讲述自己性侵经历的强奸案幸存者,当他们受到支持提供者的负面反应时,往往会因此而受到惩罚。这些负面反应可能因此起到一种压制作用,导致一些强奸案幸存者完全不再向任何人谈论自己的经历。当前的研究试图考察这种最糟糕的情况。该研究聚焦于八名强奸案幸存者的定性叙述,这些幸存者最初披露了性侵事件,但随后在很长一段时间内停止了披露,旨在深入描述负面反应是如何让这些幸存者保持沉默的。确定了导致沉默的三条途径:1)专业人员的负面反应使幸存者质疑未来的披露是否会有效;2)朋友和家人的负面反应强化了自责感;3)来自任何一方的负面反应都强化了他们对自己的经历是否属于强奸的不确定性。文中还讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。