Woodrow Sarah I, Segouin Christophe, Armbruster Judith, Hamstra Stanley J, Hodges Brian
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Acad Med. 2006 Dec;81(12):1045-51. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000246751.27480.55.
Resident duty hours restrictions have now been instituted in many countries worldwide. Such policies have resulted in a broad-based discussion in the medical literature concerning their effects on patient care, resident education, and resident well-being. To better understand the impetuses behind these changes, the authors examine not only the duty hours mandates currently in effect in the United States, Canada, and France, but also the events influencing their independent development in these three countries. In the United States, an 80-hour resident workweek was mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education out of concern for patient safety. In France, a 52.5-hour workweek was decreed by the government, reflecting the broader European Working Time Directive initiated out of concern for the negative impact of extended work hours on its population. In Canada, resident unions, whose primary interest has been one of resident well-being, have negotiated a series of reduced resident duty hours that approach those mandated in the United States. At the core of these changes are unique differences in these countries' health care and medical education systems. The resulting diversity in the origin and nature of such regulations serves to highlight the lack of evidence that has guided their development and the need to refocus on the educational elements of postgraduate training.
目前,全球许多国家都实行了住院医师值班时间限制政策。此类政策引发了医学文献界对其对患者护理、住院医师教育及住院医师福祉影响的广泛讨论。为了更好地理解这些变化背后的推动因素,作者不仅研究了美国、加拿大和法国目前生效的值班时间规定,还探讨了影响这三个国家各自制定这些规定的相关事件。在美国,研究生医学教育认证委员会出于对患者安全的担忧,规定住院医师每周工作时长为80小时。在法国,政府颁布了每周52.5小时的工作周规定,这反映了更广泛的欧洲工作时间指令,该指令是出于对延长工作时间对民众负面影响的担忧而发起的。在加拿大,主要关注住院医师福祉的住院医师工会通过谈判达成了一系列减少住院医师值班时间的协议,这些时间接近美国规定的时长。这些变化的核心在于这些国家医疗保健和医学教育系统存在的独特差异。此类规定在起源和性质上的多样性凸显了在其制定过程中缺乏指导证据,以及需要重新关注研究生培训中的教育要素。