Stone Nimalie D, O'Hara Caroline M, Williams Portia P, McGowan John E, Tenover Fred C
Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, 69 Jesse Hill, Jr., Dr. S.E., Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb;45(2):340-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01782-06. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
We compared the antimicrobial susceptibility testing results generated by disk diffusion and the VITEK 2 automated system with the results of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method for 61 isolates of unusual species of Enterobacteriaceae. The isolates represented 15 genera and 26 different species, including Buttiauxella, Cedecea, Kluyvera, Leminorella, and Yokenella. Antimicrobial agents included aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. CLSI interpretative criteria for Enterobacteriaceae were used. Of the 12 drugs tested by BMD and disk diffusion, 10 showed >95% categorical agreement (CA). CA was lower for ampicillin (80.3%) and cefazolin (77.0%). There were 3 very major errors (all with cefazolin), 1 major error (also with cefazolin), and 26 minor errors. Of the 40 isolates (representing 12 species) that could be identified with the VITEK 2 database, 36 were identified correctly to species level, 1 was identified to genus level only, and 3 were reported as unidentified. VITEK 2 generated MIC results for 42 (68.8%) of 61 isolates, but categorical interpretations (susceptible, intermediate, and resistant) were provided for only 22. For the 17 drugs tested by both BMD and VITEK 2, essential agreement ranged from 80.9 to 100% and CA ranged from 68.2% (ampicillin) to 100%; thirteen drugs exhibited 100% CA. In summary, disk diffusion provides a reliable alternative to BMD for testing of unusual Enterobacteriaceae, some of which cannot be tested, or produce incorrect results, by automated methods.
我们将纸片扩散法和VITEK 2自动系统产生的61株罕见肠杆菌科细菌的药敏试验结果,与临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)肉汤微量稀释(BMD)参考方法的结果进行了比较。这些分离株代表15个属和26个不同的种,包括布蒂亚克斯菌属、西地西菌属、克吕沃菌属、勒米诺菌属和约肯菌属。抗菌药物包括氨基糖苷类、碳青霉烯类、头孢菌素类、氟喹诺酮类、青霉素类以及甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑。采用CLSI对肠杆菌科细菌的解释标准。在通过BMD和纸片扩散法检测的12种药物中,10种显示出>95%的类别相符率(CA)。氨苄西林(80.3%)和头孢唑林(77.0%)的CA较低。有3个极重大错误(均与头孢唑林有关)、1个重大错误(也与头孢唑林有关)以及26个微小错误。在40株可通过VITEK 2数据库鉴定的分离株(代表12个种)中,36株被正确鉴定到种水平,1株仅被鉴定到属水平,3株报告为无法鉴定。VITEK 2为61株分离株中的42株(68.8%)生成了MIC结果,但仅为22株提供了类别解释(敏感、中介和耐药)。在通过BMD和VITEK 2检测的17种药物中,基本相符率在80.9%至100%之间,CA在68.2%(氨苄西林)至100%之间;13种药物的CA为100%。总之,对于罕见肠杆菌科细菌的检测,纸片扩散法是BMD的可靠替代方法,其中一些细菌无法通过自动化方法检测,或会产生错误结果。