• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 M 型超声心动图评估中低收入国家 2 型糖尿病患者的主动脉弹性指数改变:一项横断面对比研究。

Alterations in aortic elasticity indices among type 2 diabetes patients in a low and middle income country using M-mode echocardiography: A cross-sectional comparative study.

机构信息

The Faculty of Medicine, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.

University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0305799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305799. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0305799
PMID:39446822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11500911/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is one of the leading causes of noncommunicable diseases worldwide. It is known to induce cardiovascular remodeling, which can result in a variety of complications, including a considerable increase in aortic stiffness. While studies in Western populations have explored these effects, data on Asians, mainly Vietnamese, are limited. This study aimed to assess aortic elasticity in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients compared to healthy individuals.

METHODS

This quantitative, cross-sectional study compared aortic elasticity indices between individuals with T2DM and healthy controls in Vietnam. Aortic elasticity indices were assessed for all participants using M-mode echocardiography.

RESULTS

A comparison between the healthy and T2DM groups revealed substantial differences in aortic elasticity indices. The aortic stiffness index (ASI) was significantly greater in the T2DM group than in the control group, with median values of 6.10 (3.64-12.47) and 3.79 (2.40-8.50), respectively (p = 0.003). Aortic strain (AS) was substantially lower in the T2DM group than in the control group, with median values of 8.21% (4.24-13.07) and 10.66% (6.01-18.23), respectively (p = 0.039). Furthermore, the median aortic compliance (AC, 10-2mm/mmHg) and aortic distensibility (AD, 10-3mmHg-1) in individuals with T2DM were 4.07 (2.28-7.44) and 3.08 (1.57-5.26), respectively, lower than those in the control group, with median values of 6.40 (3.08-10.75) and 5.33 (2.80-9.79). A longer diabetes duration was linked to a greater ASI (r = 0.43, p < 0.05), while the AS decreased (r = -0.37, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variations in aorta elasticity indices were found in patients with T2DM using M-mode echocardiography. These differences highlight the impact of T2DM on vascular health. More research is needed to investigate the consequences of these discrepancies and their significance for clinical purposes.

摘要

背景

糖尿病是全球导致非传染性疾病的主要原因之一。已知它会引起心血管重构,从而导致多种并发症,包括主动脉僵硬度的显著增加。虽然西方人群的研究已经探讨了这些影响,但关于亚洲人(主要是越南人)的数据有限。本研究旨在评估 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者与健康个体的主动脉弹性。

方法

这是一项在越南进行的定量、横断面研究,比较了 T2DM 患者和健康对照者的主动脉弹性指数。使用 M 型超声心动图评估所有参与者的主动脉弹性指数。

结果

健康组和 T2DM 组之间的比较显示,主动脉弹性指数存在显著差异。T2DM 组的主动脉僵硬度指数(ASI)明显高于对照组,中位数分别为 6.10(3.64-12.47)和 3.79(2.40-8.50)(p = 0.003)。T2DM 组的主动脉应变(AS)明显低于对照组,中位数分别为 8.21%(4.24-13.07)和 10.66%(6.01-18.23)(p = 0.039)。此外,T2DM 患者的主动脉顺应性(AC,10-2mm/mmHg)和主动脉可扩张性(AD,10-3mmHg-1)的中位数分别为 4.07(2.28-7.44)和 3.08(1.57-5.26),均低于对照组的 6.40(3.08-10.75)和 5.33(2.80-9.79)。糖尿病病程较长与 ASI 增加相关(r = 0.43,p < 0.05),而 AS 降低(r = -0.37,p < 0.05)。

结论

使用 M 型超声心动图发现 T2DM 患者的主动脉弹性指数存在显著差异。这些差异突出了 T2DM 对血管健康的影响。需要进一步研究这些差异的后果及其对临床的意义。

相似文献

1
Alterations in aortic elasticity indices among type 2 diabetes patients in a low and middle income country using M-mode echocardiography: A cross-sectional comparative study.使用 M 型超声心动图评估中低收入国家 2 型糖尿病患者的主动脉弹性指数改变:一项横断面对比研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0305799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305799. eCollection 2024.
2
Local elasticity of the aorta in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病患者主动脉的局部弹性
J Int Med Res. 2020 Sep;48(9):300060520952643. doi: 10.1177/0300060520952643.
3
Evaluation of the Effect of Essential Hypertension on Elasticity of Ascending Aorta in Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus Patients by Echocardiography.超声心动图评价 2 型糖尿病合并原发性高血压对升主动脉弹性的影响。
Angiology. 2020 Jul;71(6):536-543. doi: 10.1177/0003319720911572. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
The role of type 2 diabetes mellitus on hypertensive-related aortic stiffness.2型糖尿病在高血压相关主动脉僵硬度中的作用。
Echocardiography. 2018 Jun;35(6):798-803. doi: 10.1111/echo.13841. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
5
Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on aortic elastic properties in normotensive diabetes: Doppler tissue imaging study.2型糖尿病对血压正常的糖尿病患者主动脉弹性特性的影响:多普勒组织成像研究
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Dec;19(12):1471-81. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.06.004.
6
Decreased aortic root elasticity-as a novel systemic manifestation of the pseudoexfoliation syndrome: an observational study.主动脉根部弹性降低——作为假性剥脱综合征的一种新的全身表现:一项观察性研究。
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2012 Sep;12(6):483-7. doi: 10.5152/akd.2012.155. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
7
Assessment of the elasticity properties of the ascending aorta in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism by tissue Doppler imaging.通过组织多普勒成像评估亚临床甲状腺功能减退症患者升主动脉的弹性特性。
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2013 Mar;57(2):132-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302013000200006.
8
Ascending Aortic Elasticity and Related Risk Factors Study on Prehypertension Patients.高血压前期患者升主动脉弹性及相关危险因素研究
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Jan;30(1):61-66. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw126. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
Can aortic elastic parameters be used for the diagnosis of volume overload in patients with end stage renal disease.主动脉弹性参数能否用于诊断终末期肾病患者的容量超负荷。
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2012;36(1):268-77. doi: 10.1159/000343416. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
10
Elasticity of ascending aorta and left ventricular myocardial functions in children with bicuspid aortic valve.二叶式主动脉瓣患儿升主动脉弹性及左心室心肌功能
Echocardiography. 2017 Nov;34(11):1660-1666. doi: 10.1111/echo.13664. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Alterations in aortic elasticity indices among type 2 diabetes patients in a low and middle income country using M-mode echocardiography: A cross-sectional comparative study.更正:使用M型超声心动图对低收入和中等收入国家2型糖尿病患者主动脉弹性指数变化的研究:一项横断面比较研究
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0321115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321115. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the relationship between left atrial stiffness, left ventricular stiffness, and left atrioventricular coupling index in type 2 diabetes patients: a speckle tracking echocardiography study.2型糖尿病患者左心房僵硬度、左心室僵硬度与左房室耦合指数之间关系的评估:一项斑点追踪超声心动图研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 25;11:1372181. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1372181. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluating left atrial function changes by speckle tracking echocardiography in type 2 diabetes patients in Central Vietnam: a cross-sectional comparative study.越南中部2型糖尿病患者斑点追踪超声心动图评估左心房功能变化:一项横断面比较研究。
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Mar 28;76(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00470-w.
3
Visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is associated with aortic stiffness progression in participants with type 2 diabetes.
HbA1c 变异性与 2 型糖尿病患者主动脉僵硬进展有关。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Jul 6;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01884-7.
4
Time in Range Estimation in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes is Improved by Incorporating Fasting and Postprandial Glucose Levels.纳入空腹和餐后血糖水平可改善2型糖尿病患者的血糖达标时间估算。
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Aug;14(8):1373-1386. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01432-2. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
5
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Aging: A Review by the VascAgeNet COST Action.磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描在动脉老化无创评估中的应用:VascAgeNet COST 行动综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e027414. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027414. Epub 2023 May 15.
6
Diabetic vascular diseases: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.糖尿病血管病变:分子机制与治疗策略。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023 Apr 10;8(1):152. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01400-z.
7
Angiotensin II Type 1A Receptor Expressed in Smooth Muscle Cells is Required for Hypertensive Vascular Remodeling in Mice Infused With Angiotensin II.血管紧张素 II 型 1A 受体在平滑肌细胞中的表达是血管紧张素 II 输注小鼠高血压血管重构所必需的。
Hypertension. 2023 Mar;80(3):668-677. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20601. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
8
Association between arterial stiffness/remodeling and new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus in general population.普通人群中动脉僵硬度/重塑与新发2型糖尿病之间的关联。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;196:110237. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110237. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
9
2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Dec 13;146(24):e334-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
10
Arterial Stiffness and HbA1c: Association Mediated by Insulin Resistance in Hispanic Adults.动脉僵硬度与 HbA1c:胰岛素抵抗在西班牙裔成年人中的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 3;19(17):11017. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711017.