Scheinberg Phillip, Fischer Steven H, Li Li, Nunez Olga, Wu Colin O, Sloand Elaine M, Cohen Jeffrey I, Young Neal S, John Barrett A
Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Blood. 2007 Apr 15;109(8):3219-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-045625. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
The natural history of EBV and CMV reactivation and the potential for serious complications following antibody-based immunosuppressive treatment for bone marrow failure syndromes in the absence of transplantation is not known. We monitored blood for EBV and CMV reactivation by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) weekly in 78 consecutive patients (total of 99 immunosuppressive courses) with aplastic anemia. Four regimens were studied: (1) HC, horse ATG/cyclosporine; (2) HCS, horse ATG/CsA/sirolimus; (3) RC, rabbit ATG/CsA; and (4) CP, alemtuzumab. There were no cases of EBV or CMV disease, but EBV reactivation occurred in 82 (87%) of 94 and CMV reactivation in 19 (33%) of 57 seropositive patients after starting immunosuppression. The median peak EBV copies were higher in the RC group when compared with HC, HCS, and alemtuzumab (P < .001). The median duration of PCR positivity for EBV was higher in the RC group compared with HC, HCS, and alemtuzumab (P = .001). Subclinical reactivation of both EBV and CMV is common and nearly always self-limited in patients with bone marrow failure receiving immunosuppression; different regimens are associated with different intensity of immunosuppression as measured by viral load and lymphocyte count; and viral reactivation patterns differ according to immunosuppressive regimens.
在未进行移植的情况下,对于骨髓衰竭综合征采用基于抗体的免疫抑制治疗后,EB病毒(EBV)和巨细胞病毒(CMV)再激活的自然病程以及发生严重并发症的可能性尚不清楚。我们对78例连续的再生障碍性贫血患者(共99个免疫抑制疗程)每周通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)监测血液中的EBV和CMV再激活情况。研究了四种治疗方案:(1)HC,马抗胸腺细胞球蛋白/环孢素;(2)HCS,马抗胸腺细胞球蛋白/环孢素/西罗莫司;(3)RC,兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白/环孢素;(4)CP,阿仑单抗。未出现EBV或CMV疾病病例,但在开始免疫抑制后,94例血清阳性患者中有82例(87%)发生了EBV再激活,57例中有19例(33%)发生了CMV再激活。与HC、HCS和阿仑单抗组相比,RC组EBV拷贝数峰值中位数更高(P <.001)。与HC、HCS和阿仑单抗组相比,RC组EBV PCR阳性持续时间中位数更长(P =.001)。在接受免疫抑制的骨髓衰竭患者中,EBV和CMV的亚临床再激活很常见,且几乎总是自限性的;不同治疗方案与通过病毒载量和淋巴细胞计数衡量的不同免疫抑制强度相关;病毒再激活模式因免疫抑制方案而异。