Hill Catherine, Soares Pedro, Mormina Maru, Macaulay Vincent, Clarke Dougie, Blumbach Petya B, Vizuete-Forster Matthieu, Forster Peter, Bulbeck David, Oppenheimer Stephen, Richards Martin
Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Jan;80(1):29-43. doi: 10.1086/510412. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) was first colonized by modern humans at least 45,000 years ago, but the extent to which the modern inhabitants trace their ancestry to the first settlers is a matter of debate. It is widely held, in both archaeology and linguistics, that they are largely descended from a second wave of dispersal, proto-Austronesian-speaking agriculturalists who originated in China and spread to Taiwan approximately 5,500 years ago. From there, they are thought to have dispersed into ISEA approximately 4,000 years ago, assimilating the indigenous populations. Here, we demonstrate that mitochondrial DNA diversity in the region is extremely high and includes a large number of indigenous clades. Only a fraction of these date back to the time of first settlement, and the majority appear to mark dispersals in the late-Pleistocene or early-Holocene epoch most likely triggered by postglacial flooding. There are much closer genetic links to Taiwan than to the mainland, but most of these probably predated the mid-Holocene "Out of Taiwan" event as traditionally envisioned. Only approximately 20% at most of modern mitochondrial DNAs in ISEA could be linked to such an event, suggesting that, if an agriculturalist migration did take place, it was demographically minor, at least with regard to the involvement of women.
东南亚岛屿地区(ISEA)至少在4.5万年前首次被现代人殖民,但现代居民追溯其祖先至首批定居者的程度仍存在争议。在考古学和语言学领域,人们普遍认为,他们主要是第二批迁徙者的后裔,这些说南岛语系的农业人群起源于中国,大约在5500年前传播到台湾。从那里开始,他们被认为大约在4000年前扩散到ISEA,同化了当地人口。在这里,我们证明该地区的线粒体DNA多样性极高,包括大量本土分支。其中只有一小部分可以追溯到首次定居的时期,而大多数似乎标志着晚更新世或全新世早期的扩散,最有可能是由冰后期洪水引发的。与台湾的基因联系比与中国大陆的更为紧密,但其中大多数可能早于传统设想的全新世中期“走出台湾”事件。ISEA中最多只有约20%的现代线粒体DNA可能与这一事件有关,这表明,如果确实发生了农业人群的迁徙,至少就女性的参与而言,在人口统计学上规模较小。