Ahn Inn-Sook, Kim Ji-Hae, Saxton Judith, Kim Doh Kwan
Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;22(7):682-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.1731.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a short form of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) for a Korean population. Eighty-four Alzheimer's disease patients with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) stages 2 (n = 32) or 3 (n = 52) and scores of less than 15 on the Korean version-Mini Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) participated in this study. Seventeen of the patients were men and 67 were women, and the mean age was 75 (SD = 10.4). Cronbach's coefficient alpha of the shortened SIB (SIB-S) was 0.93, and the item-total correlation was significant. Test-retest correlation for the total SIB-S score and subscale scores was significant, with the exception of the 'orienting to name' subscale. Construct validity was confirmed by evaluating the correlation between the SIB-S and the SIB, K-MMSE, CDR, and S-ADL; Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.96, 0.88, -0.67, and -0.63, respectively, which were found to be significant. The difference in the total SIB-S score and its subscale scores between the CDR 2 and CDR 3 groups was significant, except for the 'orienting to name' subscale. More severely demented patients also showed a wide range of the SIB-S score. Finally, the diagnostic accuracy of the SIB-S was high (AUC = 89.5%) in the differentiation of the CDR 2 and 3 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the SIB-S were 91% and 80%, respectively, when the cut-off score was 32.5. Our results indicate that the SIB-S is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating patients with severe dementia in the Korean population.
本研究的目的是评估简易重度损害量表(SIB)简版在韩国人群中的信度和效度。84例临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)为2期(n = 32)或3期(n = 52)且韩国版简易精神状态检查表(K-MMSE)得分低于15分的阿尔茨海默病患者参与了本研究。其中17例为男性,67例为女性,平均年龄为75岁(标准差 = 10.4)。简版SIB(SIB-S)的克朗巴哈系数α为0.93,项目与总分的相关性显著。除“定向至姓名”分量表外,SIB-S总分及各分量表得分的重测相关性显著。通过评估SIB-S与SIB、K-MMSE、CDR和S-ADL之间的相关性来确认结构效度;斯皮尔曼相关系数分别为0.96、0.88、-0.67和-0.63,均具有显著性。除“定向至姓名”分量表外,CDR 2组和CDR 3组之间SIB-S总分及其各分量表得分的差异具有显著性。痴呆程度更严重的患者SIB-S得分范围也更广。最后,SIB-S在区分CDR 2期和3期患者方面诊断准确性较高(曲线下面积 = 89.5%)。当临界值为32.5时,SIB-S的敏感性和特异性分别为91%和80%。我们的结果表明,SIB-S是评估韩国人群中重度痴呆患者的可靠且有效的工具。