• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重障碍量表在台湾中重度阿尔茨海默病患者中的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the severe impairment battery in Taiwanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Dementia Center, Department of Neurology, Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Shuang Ho Hospital, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2020 Nov;83(11):1014-1019. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000412.

DOI:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000412
PMID:32796320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647445/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The severe impairment battery (SIB) was developed to evaluate cognitive functions in moderate to severe dementia patients. We aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of the SIB (T-SIB) in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

AD patients with clinical dementia rating (CDR) stage 2 (n = 79) or 3 (n = 21) and scores <15 on the Taiwanese version of mini mental state examination (T-MMSE) were recruited from six hospitals in Taiwan. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the T-SIB. The CDR and functional assessment staging (FAST) scores were used to assess dementia severity.

RESULTS

We recruited 100 AD patients (73 women and 27 men; mean T-SIB score, 56.4 ± 24.8). The mean T-SIB total score for patients with CDR 2 and 3 were 60.3 ± 23.3 and 41.2 ± 24.9, respectively. The internal consistency of the T-SIB was 0.96. The T-SIB was moderately correlated with the T-MMSE (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.76). The areas under the curve for discriminating between CDR 2 and CDR 3 were 0.81 (95% CI = 0.91-0.71) and 0.72 (95% CI = 0.84-0.61), respectively. Using a cut-off score of 59, the T-SIB had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 61% for discriminating between CDR 2 and CDR 3. Using a cut-off score of 45, the T-SIB had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 73.1% for discriminating between the FAST stage 7c.

CONCLUSION

T-SIB is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring cognition of severely demented Taiwanese AD patients.

摘要

背景

严重损伤电池(SIB)旨在评估中度至重度痴呆患者的认知功能。我们旨在研究台湾版 SIB(T-SIB)在中度至重度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者中的可靠性和有效性。

方法

从台湾六家医院招募临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)阶段 2(n=79)或 3(n=21)且台湾版简易精神状态检查表(T-MMSE)得分<15 的 AD 患者。采用克朗巴赫α评估 T-SIB 的内部一致性。CDR 和功能评估分期(FAST)评分用于评估痴呆严重程度。

结果

我们共招募了 100 名 AD 患者(73 名女性和 27 名男性;T-SIB 平均得分 56.4±24.8)。CDR 2 和 3 患者的 T-SIB 总分分别为 60.3±23.3 和 41.2±24.9。T-SIB 的内部一致性为 0.96。T-SIB 与 T-MMSE 中度相关(皮尔逊相关系数=0.76)。区分 CDR 2 和 CDR 3 的曲线下面积分别为 0.81(95%CI=0.91-0.71)和 0.72(95%CI=0.84-0.61)。使用 59 分的截断值,T-SIB 区分 CDR 2 和 CDR 3 的敏感性为 80%,特异性为 61%。使用 45 分的截断值,T-SIB 区分 FAST 阶段 7c 的敏感性为 83.3%,特异性为 73.1%。

结论

T-SIB 是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于测量严重痴呆的台湾 AD 患者的认知功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade6/7647445/9c9fa839c0e7/ca9-83-1014-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade6/7647445/88f80add0ab7/ca9-83-1014-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade6/7647445/9c9fa839c0e7/ca9-83-1014-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade6/7647445/88f80add0ab7/ca9-83-1014-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade6/7647445/9c9fa839c0e7/ca9-83-1014-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the severe impairment battery in Taiwanese patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.严重障碍量表在台湾中重度阿尔茨海默病患者中的信度和效度。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2020 Nov;83(11):1014-1019. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000412.
2
Reliability and validity of a short form of the Severe Impairment Battery in Korean Alzheimer's disease patients.韩国阿尔茨海默病患者简易严重损害量表的信度和效度
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;22(7):682-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.1731.
3
Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB).《严重损伤量表》(SIB)挪威语版本的信度与效度
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;23(9):896-902. doi: 10.1002/gps.2001.
4
Development and validation of the Greek severe impairment battery (SIB).希腊严重损伤量表(SIB)的编制与验证
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Apr;26(4):591-6. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213002548. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
5
Reliability and validity of the severe impairment battery (SIB) in Korean dementia patients.重度损伤量表(SIB)在韩国痴呆患者中的信度和效度
J Korean Med Sci. 2006 Jun;21(3):506-17. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.3.506.
6
Chinese Version of the Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination: A Brief Staging Measure for Patients with Severe Alzheimer's Disease.中文版贝勒深度精神状态检查:用于严重阿尔茨海默病患者的简要分期测量工具。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(2):175-180. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2020.72.
7
Neuropsychological assessment of severely demeted elderly: the severe cognitive impairment profile.重度痴呆老年人的神经心理学评估:严重认知障碍概况。
Arch Neurol. 1996 Apr;53(4):367-72. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550040107020.
8
Validation of the Severe Impairment Battery for patients with Alzheimer's disease in Korea.韩国阿尔茨海默病患者严重损害量表的验证
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;21(7):626-32. doi: 10.1002/gps.1537.
9
An Arabic Version of the Cognitive Subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog): Reliability, Validity, and Normative Data.阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)的阿拉伯文版本:信度、效度和常模数据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(1):11-21. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170222.
10
Longitudinal Neuropsychological Outcome in Taiwanese Alzheimer's Disease Patients Treated with Medication.台湾地区接受药物治疗的阿尔茨海默病患者的纵向神经心理学转归
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018 Mar 14;15(5):474-481. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666171010112518.

本文引用的文献

1
Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2019.2019年阿尔茨海默病药物研发进程
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Jul 9;5:272-293. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.05.008. eCollection 2019.
2
Development and validation of the Greek severe impairment battery (SIB).希腊严重损伤量表(SIB)的编制与验证
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Apr;26(4):591-6. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213002548. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
Functional assessment staging (FAST) in Korean patients with Alzheimer's disease.韩国阿尔茨海默病患者的功能评估分期(FAST)。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(1):151-8. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100072.
4
Life expectancy in Alzheimer's disease (AD).阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的预期寿命。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49 Suppl 1:237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.09.035.
5
Longitudinal study of the transition from healthy aging to Alzheimer disease.从健康衰老到阿尔茨海默病转变的纵向研究。
Arch Neurol. 2009 Oct;66(10):1254-9. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.158.
6
Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB).《严重损伤量表》(SIB)挪威语版本的信度与效度
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;23(9):896-902. doi: 10.1002/gps.2001.
7
Reliability and validity of a short form of the Severe Impairment Battery in Korean Alzheimer's disease patients.韩国阿尔茨海默病患者简易严重损害量表的信度和效度
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;22(7):682-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.1731.
8
Validation of the Severe Impairment Battery for patients with Alzheimer's disease in Korea.韩国阿尔茨海默病患者严重损害量表的验证
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;21(7):626-32. doi: 10.1002/gps.1537.
9
Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial.美金刚治疗已接受多奈哌齐治疗的中重度阿尔茨海默病患者:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 21;291(3):317-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.3.317.
10
Is SIB or BNP better than MMSE in discriminating the cognitive performance of severely impaired elderly patients?在鉴别重度认知障碍老年患者的认知表现方面,自我伤害行为(SIB)或脑钠肽(BNP)是否比简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)更具优势?
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2000 Jan;15(1):21-9.