Barczyński Marcin, Konturek Aleksander, Gołkowski Filip, Cichoń Stanisław, Huszno Bohdan, Peitgen Klaus, Walz Martin K
Department of Endocrine Surgery, 3rd Chair of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University College of Medicine, 37 Pradnicka Street, Kraków, PL 31202, Poland.
World J Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0083-8.
Today, the posterior retroperitoneoscopic technique has become a standard procedure in adrenal surgery. The procedure allows direct access to the adrenal glands, but it seems to be difficult because of the uncommon anatomic view. This study compares the learning period of the new procedure of "posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy" in the primary invention phase and the secondary introductory phase in a different hospital 10 years later.
The analysis included 100 posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomies (PRA) and involved 50 procedures in each center. Group A consisted of 44 patients (14 males, 30 females; age: 48.7 +/- 14.5 years) undergoing surgery between 07/1994 and 8/1996 (24 right, 26 left; 8 Cushing adenomas, 14 Conn adenomas, 11 pheochromocytomas, 7 nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas, 10 ACTH-dependent adrenal hyperplasias). Group B consisted of 50 patients (12 males, 38 females; mean age 59.3 +/- 10.7 years) operated between 01/2004 and 01/2006 (28 right, 22 left tumors; 5 Cushing adenomas, 12 Conn adenomas, 4 pheochromocytomas, 29 nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas). All PRAs were performed with the patient in the prone position with 3-4 trocars placed caudally in the region of the 11th and 12th ribs. In group A, the surgical team developed the technique of PRA themselves. Before their first PRA, the surgical team of group B was introduced to the technique by the group A surgeons and afterwards were supervised continuously.
No serious intraoperative or postoperative complication occurred in either group. Group A experienced 7 conversions to open surgery, whereas group B had one conversion and one early reoperation due to bleeding (P = 0.03; chi(2)-test). The mean operative time was 117 +/- 41 minutes versus 83 +/- 35 minutes (group A and B respectively; P < 0.001; t-test). Estimated blood loss was similar in the two groups (47.2 +/- 46.2 ml versus 54 +/- 16.3 ml, group A versus B, respectively; P = 0.36; t-test).
The study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of the new surgical method of PRA both when it is employed in the early phase of invention, as well as when performed by surgeon-learners. After comprehensive training, the operative time and conversion rate are dramatically reduced, allowing for a short learning period.
如今,后腹腔镜技术已成为肾上腺手术的标准术式。该术式可直接显露肾上腺,但由于解剖视野不常见,似乎存在一定难度。本研究比较了“后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术”这一新术式在最初发明阶段和10年后在另一家医院的二次引入阶段的学习周期。
分析纳入了100例后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(PRA),每个中心各50例手术。A组包括44例患者(男14例,女30例;年龄:48.7±14.5岁),于1994年7月至1996年8月接受手术(右侧24例,左侧26例;库欣腺瘤8例,原发性醛固酮增多症腺瘤14例,嗜铬细胞瘤11例,无功能肾上腺皮质腺瘤7例,促肾上腺皮质激素依赖性肾上腺增生10例)。B组包括50例患者(男12例,女38例;平均年龄59.3±10.7岁),于2004年1月至2006年1月接受手术(右侧肿瘤28例,左侧肿瘤22例;库欣腺瘤5例,原发性醛固酮增多症腺瘤12例,嗜铬细胞瘤4例,无功能肾上腺皮质腺瘤29例)。所有PRA手术均在患者俯卧位下进行,在第11和12肋区域尾侧置入3 - 4个套管针。A组手术团队自行研发PRA技术。B组手术团队在首次进行PRA之前,由A组外科医生介绍该技术,之后持续接受监督。
两组均未发生严重的术中或术后并发症。A组有7例转为开放手术,而B组有1例转为开放手术以及1例因出血早期再次手术(P = 0.03;卡方检验)。平均手术时间分别为A组117±41分钟和B组83±35分钟(P < 0.001;t检验)。两组估计失血量相似(A组47.2±46.2 ml,B组54±16.3 ml;P = 0.36;t检验)。
该研究表明,PRA这种新手术方法无论是在发明早期应用,还是由初学者外科医生实施,均具有可行性、安全性和可重复性。经过全面培训后,手术时间和中转率显著降低,学习周期缩短。