Baker Laurence C, Afendulis Christopher C, Chandra Amitabh, McConville Shannon, Phibbs Ciaran S, Fuentes-Afflick Elena
Department of Health Research, and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jan;161(1):69-76. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.69.
To obtain information about health outcomes in neonates in 9 subgroups of the Asian population in the United States.
Cross-sectional comparison of outcomes for births to mothers of Cambodian, Chinese, Filipino, Indian, Japanese, Korean, Laotian, Thai, and Vietnamese origin and for births to non-Hispanic white mothers. Regression models were used to compare neonatal mortality across groups before and after controlling for various risk factors.
All California births between January 1,1991, and December 31, 2001.
More than 2.3 million newborn infants.
Racial and ethnic groups.
Neonatal mortality (death within 28 days of birth).
The unadjusted mortality rate for births to non-Hispanic white mothers was 2.0 per 1000. The unadjusted mortality rate for births to Chinese and Japanese mothers was significantly lower (Chinese: 1.2 per 1000, P<.001; Japanese: 1.2 per 1000, P=.004), and for births to Korean mothers the rate was significantly higher (2.7 per 1000, P=.003). For infants of Chinese mothers, observed risk factors explain the differences observed in unadjusted data. For infants of Cambodian, Japanese, Korean, and Thai mothers, differences persist or widen after risk factors are considered. After risk adjustment, infants of Cambodian, Japanese, and Korean mothers have significantly lower neonatal mortality rates compared with infants born to non-Hispanic white mothers (adjusted odds ratios, 0.58 for infants of Cambodian mothers, 0.67 for infants of Japanese mothers, and 0.69 for infants of Korean mothers; all P<.05); infants of Thai mothers have higher neonatal mortality rates (adjusted odds ratio, 1.89; P<.05).
There are significant variations in neonatal mortality between subgroups of the Asian American population that are not entirely explained by differences in observable risk factors. Efforts to improve clinical care that treat Asian Americans as a homogeneous group may miss important opportunities for improving infant health in specific subgroups.
获取美国亚洲人群9个亚组中新生儿健康结局的信息。
对柬埔寨、中国、菲律宾、印度、日本、韩国、老挝、泰国和越南裔母亲所生孩子以及非西班牙裔白人母亲所生孩子的结局进行横断面比较。在控制各种风险因素前后,使用回归模型比较各亚组的新生儿死亡率。
1991年1月1日至2001年12月31日期间加利福尼亚州的所有分娩。
超过230万新生儿。
种族和族裔群体。
新生儿死亡率(出生后28天内死亡)。
非西班牙裔白人母亲所生孩子的未调整死亡率为每1000例中有2.0例。中国和日本母亲所生孩子的未调整死亡率显著较低(中国:每1000例中有1.2例,P<0.001;日本:每1000例中有1.2例,P = 0.004),而韩国母亲所生孩子的死亡率显著较高(每1000例中有2.7例,P = 0.003)。对于中国母亲的婴儿,观察到的风险因素解释了未调整数据中观察到的差异。对于柬埔寨、日本、韩国和泰国母亲的婴儿,在考虑风险因素后差异仍然存在或扩大。经过风险调整后,柬埔寨、日本和韩国母亲的婴儿与非西班牙裔白人母亲的婴儿相比,新生儿死亡率显著较低(调整后的优势比,柬埔寨母亲的婴儿为0.58,日本母亲的婴儿为0.67,韩国母亲的婴儿为0.69;均P<0.05);泰国母亲的婴儿新生儿死亡率较高(调整后的优势比,1.89;P<0.05)。
美国亚裔人群各亚组之间的新生儿死亡率存在显著差异,这些差异不能完全由可观察到的风险因素差异来解释。将亚裔美国人视为一个同质群体来改善临床护理的努力可能会错过改善特定亚组婴儿健康的重要机会。