Suppr超能文献

血清反应因子结合位点在三种人类细胞类型中存在差异。

Serum response factor binding sites differ in three human cell types.

作者信息

Cooper Sara J, Trinklein Nathan D, Nguyen Loan, Myers Richard M

机构信息

Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5120, USA.

出版信息

Genome Res. 2007 Feb;17(2):136-44. doi: 10.1101/gr.5875007. Epub 2007 Jan 2.

Abstract

The serum response factor (SRF) is essential for embryonic development and maintenance of muscle cells and neurons. The mechanism by which this factor controls these divergent pathways is unclear. Here we present a genome-wide view of occupancy of SRF at its binding sites with a focus on those that vary with cell type. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) in combination with human promoter microarrays to identify 216 putative SRF binding sites in the human genome. We performed independent quantitative PCR validation at over half of these sites that resulted in 146 sites we assert to be true binding sites at over 90% confidence. Nearly half of the sites are bound by SRF in only one of the three cell types we tested, providing strong evidence for the diverse roles for SRF in different cell types. We also explore possible mechanisms controlling differential binding of SRF in these cell types by assaying cofactor binding, DNA methylation, histone methylation, and histone acetylation at a subset of sites bound preferentially in smooth muscle cells. Although we did not see a strong correlation between SRF binding and epigenetics modifications, at these sites, we propose that SRF cofactors may play an important role in determining cell-dependent SRF binding sites. ELK4 (previously known as SAP-1 [SRF-associated protein-1]) is ubiquitously expressed. Therefore, we expected it to occupy sites where SRF binding is common in all cell types. Indeed, 90% of SRF sites also bound by ELK4 were common to all three cell types. Together, our data provide a more complete understanding of the regulatory network controlled by SRF.

摘要

血清反应因子(SRF)对于胚胎发育以及肌肉细胞和神经元的维持至关重要。该因子控制这些不同途径的机制尚不清楚。在此,我们展示了SRF在其结合位点的全基因组占据情况,重点关注那些随细胞类型而变化的位点。我们将染色质免疫沉淀(ChIP)与人类启动子微阵列相结合,以在人类基因组中鉴定出216个推定的SRF结合位点。我们对其中一半以上的位点进行了独立的定量PCR验证,结果得到146个我们认定为真正结合位点的位点,置信度超过90%。近一半的位点仅在我们测试的三种细胞类型之一中被SRF结合,这为SRF在不同细胞类型中的多样作用提供了有力证据。我们还通过检测在平滑肌细胞中优先结合的一部分位点处的辅因子结合、DNA甲基化、组蛋白甲基化和组蛋白乙酰化,探索了控制SRF在这些细胞类型中差异结合的可能机制。尽管我们在这些位点上没有看到SRF结合与表观遗传修饰之间有很强的相关性,但我们提出SRF辅因子可能在确定细胞依赖性SRF结合位点中起重要作用。ELK4(以前称为SAP-1 [SRF相关蛋白-1])普遍表达。因此,我们预计它会占据在所有细胞类型中SRF结合常见的位点。实际上,90%的也被ELK4结合的SRF位点在所有三种细胞类型中都是共同的。总之,我们的数据提供了对由SRF控制的调控网络的更完整理解。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
EGR-mediated control of STIM expression and function.EGR 介导的 STIM 表达和功能的调控。
Cell Calcium. 2019 Jan;77:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs.MEME:发现和分析DNA与蛋白质序列基序
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W369-73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl198.
4
The UCSC Known Genes.加州大学圣克鲁兹分校已知基因
Bioinformatics. 2006 May 1;22(9):1036-46. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl048. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
7
Ensembl 2006.Ensembl 2006。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D556-61. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj133.
9
Defining the mammalian CArGome.定义哺乳动物的CArGome。
Genome Res. 2006 Feb;16(2):197-207. doi: 10.1101/gr.4108706. Epub 2005 Dec 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验