Skogstad Anders, Einarsen Ståle, Torsheim Torbjørn, Aasland Merethe Schanke, Hetland Hilde
University of Bergen, Faculty of Psychology, Bergen, Norway.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;12(1):80-92. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80.
The aim of the study is to test the assumption that laissez-faire leadership behavior is not a type of zero-leadership, but a type of destructive leadership behavior that shows systematic relationships with workplace stressors, bullying at work, and psychological distress. A survey of 2,273 Norwegian employees was conducted and analyzed. Laissez-faire leadership was positively correlated with role conflict, role ambiguity, and conflicts with coworkers. Path modeling showed that these stressors mediated the effects of laissez-faire leadership on bullying at work and that the effects of laissez-faire leadership on distress were mediated through the workplace stressors, especially through exposure to bullying. The results support the assumption that laissez-faire leadership behavior is a destructive leadership behavior.
该研究的目的是检验这样一种假设,即放任型领导行为并非一种零领导类型,而是一种具有破坏性的领导行为,它与工作场所压力源、职场霸凌及心理困扰存在系统性关联。对2273名挪威员工进行了调查并分析。放任型领导与角色冲突、角色模糊以及与同事的冲突呈正相关。路径模型表明,这些压力源介导了放任型领导对职场霸凌的影响,且放任型领导对困扰的影响是通过工作场所压力源介导的,尤其是通过遭受霸凌来介导。研究结果支持了放任型领导行为是一种具有破坏性的领导行为这一假设。