• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

权力、谈判倾向以及在竞争互动中率先行动。

Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions.

作者信息

Magee Joe C, Galinsky Adam D, Gruenfeld Deborah H

机构信息

New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Feb;33(2):200-12. doi: 10.1177/0146167206294413.

DOI:10.1177/0146167206294413
PMID:17259581
Abstract

Five experiments investigated how the possession and experience of power affects the initiation of competitive interaction. In Experiments 1a and 1b, high-power individuals displayed a greater propensity to initiate a negotiation than did low-power individuals. Three additional experiments showed that power increased the likelihood of making the first move in a variety of competitive interactions. In Experiment 2, participants who were semantically primed with power were nearly 4 times as likely as participants in a control condition to choose to make the opening arguments in a debate competition scenario. In Experiment 3, negotiators with strong alternatives to a negotiation were more than 3 times as likely to spontaneously express an intention to make the first offer compared to participants who lacked any alternatives. Experiment 4 showed that high-power negotiators were more likely than low-power negotiators to actually make the first offer and that making the first offer produced a bargaining advantage.

摘要

五项实验研究了权力的拥有和体验如何影响竞争互动的发起。在实验1a和1b中,高权力个体比低权力个体表现出更大的发起谈判的倾向。另外三项实验表明,权力增加了在各种竞争互动中率先行动的可能性。在实验2中,在语义上受到权力启动的参与者在辩论比赛场景中选择率先发言的可能性几乎是对照组参与者的4倍。在实验3中,与没有任何替代方案的参与者相比,有强大谈判替代方案的谈判者自发表达率先报价意图的可能性高出3倍多。实验4表明,高权力谈判者比低权力谈判者更有可能实际率先报价,并且率先报价会产生谈判优势。

相似文献

1
Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions.权力、谈判倾向以及在竞争互动中率先行动。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Feb;33(2):200-12. doi: 10.1177/0146167206294413.
2
The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: self-construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations.自我概念和社会背景在决定权力持有者行为中的作用:群体间与二元纠纷解决谈判中的自我建构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;93(4):614-31. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.614.
3
Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement.动机性信息处理、策略选择与协商协议的质量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jun;90(6):927-43. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.927.
4
Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation.谁会走向谈判桌?性别和框架对谈判启动的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;93(4):600-13. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.600.
5
Anchors weigh more than power: why absolute powerlessness liberates negotiators to achieve better outcomes.锚定效应的影响大于权力:为何绝对无力感能让谈判者获得更好的结果。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):170-81. doi: 10.1177/0956797614558718. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
6
Negotiation as a form of persuasion: arguments in first offers.谈判作为一种说服形式:首次报价中的论点。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):245-55. doi: 10.1037/a0023331.
7
The remarkable robustness of the first-offer effect: across culture, power, and issues.首因效应的显著稳健性:跨越文化、权力和问题。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Dec;39(12):1547-58. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499236. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
8
The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach.谈判中情绪的人际效应:一种动机性信息加工方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Oct;87(4):510-28. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.510.
9
Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance.谈判者的讨价还价历史及其对未来谈判表现的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):350-62. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.350.
10
Regulatory focus at the bargaining table: promoting distributive and integrative success.谈判桌上的调节焦点:促进分配性与整合性成功。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Aug;31(8):1087-98. doi: 10.1177/0146167205276429.

引用本文的文献

1
Are many sex/gender differences really power differences?许多性别差异真的是权力差异吗?
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Feb 27;3(2):pgae025. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae025. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Power and Gambling: Dispositional Power Predicts Persistence on a Computerized Scratchcard Task.权力与赌博:特质性权力预示着在电脑刮刮乐任务中的坚持程度。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Mar;40(1):201-218. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10181-z. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
3
The effect of state and trait power on financial risk-taking: The mediating and moderating roles of optimism.
状态和特质权力对财务风险承担的影响:乐观的中介和调节作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 31;17(10):e0276878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276878. eCollection 2022.
4
Power and variety-seeking: A compensatory perspective.权力与寻求多样化:一种补偿视角。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 7;13:928958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928958. eCollection 2022.
5
In-Organization Ethics Power-Allocation Mechanisms and Members' Decision-Making Behavior.组织内部的伦理权力分配机制与成员的决策行为
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;12(1):6. doi: 10.3390/bs12010006.
6
How Power Influences Decision-Makers' Investment Behavior in the Domains of Loss and Gain.权力如何影响决策者在得失领域的投资行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 6;18(23):12834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312834.
7
Extension request avoidance predicts greater time stress among women.避免延期申请可减少女性的时间压力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 9;118(45). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105622118.
8
Buyers, Maybe Moving Second Is Not That Bad After All: Low-Power, Anxiety, and Making Inferior First Offers.买家们,也许后出价也并非那么糟糕:低权力感、焦虑情绪与给出较低的首次报价。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:677653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677653. eCollection 2021.
9
Predicting individual-level income from Facebook profiles.从 Facebook 个人资料预测个人收入。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214369. eCollection 2019.
10
Power Corrupts, but Control Does Not: What Stands Behind the Effects of Holding High Positions.权力导致腐败,绝对的权力导致绝对的腐败:身居高位的影响背后是什么。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;44(6):944-957. doi: 10.1177/0146167218757456. Epub 2018 Feb 27.