• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 Facebook 个人资料预测个人收入。

Predicting individual-level income from Facebook profiles.

机构信息

Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Department of Business Administration, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214369. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0214369
PMID:30921389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6438464/
Abstract

Information about a person's income can be useful in several business-related contexts, such as personalized advertising or salary negotiations. However, many people consider this information private and are reluctant to share it. In this paper, we show that income is predictable from the digital footprints people leave on Facebook. Applying an established machine learning method to an income-representative sample of 2,623 U.S. Americans, we found that (i) Facebook Likes and Status Updates alone predicted a person's income with an accuracy of up to r = 0.43, and (ii) Facebook Likes and Status Updates added incremental predictive power above and beyond a range of socio-demographic variables (ΔR2 = 6-16%, with a correlation of up to r = 0.49). Our findings highlight both opportunities for businesses and legitimate privacy concerns that such prediction models pose to individuals and society when applied without individual consent.

摘要

关于一个人的收入信息在几个与商业相关的情境中可能是有用的,例如个性化广告或薪资谈判。然而,许多人认为这些信息是隐私,不愿意分享。在本文中,我们表明,收入可以从人们在 Facebook 上留下的数字足迹中预测出来。我们应用一种成熟的机器学习方法对具有代表性的 2623 名美国成年人样本进行分析,发现(i)仅通过 Facebook 点赞和状态更新就可以以高达 r = 0.43 的准确率预测一个人的收入,(ii)Facebook 点赞和状态更新在一系列社会人口统计学变量(ΔR2 = 6-16%,最高相关系数为 r = 0.49)之外提供了额外的预测能力。我们的研究结果既突出了企业的机会,也强调了这些预测模型在未经个人同意的情况下应用时对个人和社会带来的正当隐私担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9c/6438464/e8e050e8507c/pone.0214369.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9c/6438464/abffc5fe3250/pone.0214369.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9c/6438464/d50562e94dee/pone.0214369.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9c/6438464/e8e050e8507c/pone.0214369.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9c/6438464/abffc5fe3250/pone.0214369.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9c/6438464/d50562e94dee/pone.0214369.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9c/6438464/e8e050e8507c/pone.0214369.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting individual-level income from Facebook profiles.从 Facebook 个人资料预测个人收入。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214369. eCollection 2019.
2
A new source of data for public health surveillance: Facebook likes.公共卫生监测的新数据来源:脸书点赞数。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 20;17(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3970.
3
Pregnant Women Sharing Pregnancy-Related Information on Facebook: Web-Based Survey Study.孕妇在脸书上分享妊娠相关信息:基于网络的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 22;20(3):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7753.
4
Mining Digital Traces of Facebook Activity for the Prediction of Individual Differences in Tendencies Toward Social Networks Use Disorder: A Machine Learning Approach.挖掘脸书活动的数字痕迹以预测社交网络使用障碍倾向的个体差异:一种机器学习方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 8;13:830120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830120. eCollection 2022.
5
Using Paid and Free Facebook Methods to Recruit Australian Parents to an Online Survey: An Evaluation.运用付费和免费的脸书方法招募澳大利亚家长参与在线调查:一项评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 6;21(3):e11206. doi: 10.2196/11206.
6
Characterizing Awareness of Schizophrenia Among Facebook Users by Leveraging Facebook Advertisement Estimates.通过利用Facebook广告估算来描述Facebook用户对精神分裂症的认知情况。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 8;19(5):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6815.
7
Who commits virtual identity suicide? Differences in privacy concerns, Internet addiction, and personality between Facebook users and quitters.谁会进行虚拟身份自杀?Facebook 用户和退出者在隐私关注、网络成瘾和个性方面的差异。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Sep;16(9):629-34. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0323. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
8
I Like, I Cite? Do Facebook Likes Predict the Impact of Scientific Work?我点赞,我引用?脸书点赞能预测科学工作的影响力吗?
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134389. eCollection 2015.
9
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans.基于计算机的人格判断比人类做出的判断更准确。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 27;112(4):1036-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418680112. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
10
Parsimonious data: How a single Facebook like predicts voting behavior in multiparty systems.简约数据:一个脸书点赞如何预测多党制中的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0184562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184562. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Language of elite athletes to predict their personality and on court transgressions.运用精英运动员的语言来预测他们的个性和场上违规行为。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 16;15(1):17002. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99667-5.
2
Well-Being Depends on Social Comparison: Hierarchical Models of Twitter Language Suggest That Richer Neighbors Make You Less Happy.幸福感取决于社会比较:推特语言的分层模型表明,更富有的邻居会让你更不幸福。
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2021;15:1069-1074. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18132. Epub 2021 May 22.
3
Correcting Sociodemographic Selection Biases for Population Prediction from Social Media.

本文引用的文献

1
Facebook language predicts depression in medical records.脸书的语言可预测病历中的抑郁症状。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):11203-11208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802331115. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
2
Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images.深度神经网络在从面部图像中检测性取向方面比人类更准确。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Feb;114(2):246-257. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000098.
3
Studying User Income through Language, Behaviour and Affect in Social Media.通过社交媒体中的语言、行为和情感研究用户收入
校正社交媒体人口预测中的社会人口学选择偏差
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2022 May 31;16(1):228-240.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 22;10(9):e0138717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138717. eCollection 2015.
4
Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines.脸书作为社会科学的研究工具:机遇、挑战、伦理考量及实用指南。
Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):543-56. doi: 10.1037/a0039210.
5
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans.基于计算机的人格判断比人类做出的判断更准确。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 27;112(4):1036-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418680112. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
6
Automatic personality assessment through social media language.通过社交媒体语言进行自动人格评估。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jun;108(6):934-52. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000020. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
7
Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach.社交媒体语言中的个性、性别和年龄:开放词汇方法。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e73791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073791. eCollection 2013.
8
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior.个人特质和属性可从人类行为的数字记录中预测出来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5802-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218772110. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
9
Signs of socioeconomic status: a thin-slicing approach.社会经济地位的标志:一种薄片分析法。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):99-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02251.x. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
10
Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions.权力、谈判倾向以及在竞争互动中率先行动。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Feb;33(2):200-12. doi: 10.1177/0146167206294413.