Suppr超能文献

五种常见病毒与儿童热性惊厥之间的关系。

Relationship between five common viruses and febrile seizure in children.

作者信息

Chung Brian, Wong Virginia

机构信息

Division of Neurodevelopmental Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2007 Jul;92(7):589-93. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.110221. Epub 2007 Feb 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the role of viruses in febrile seizures (FS) by comparing the relative risk (RR) of developing FS with common viral infections and subsequent risk of recurrence.

METHODS

We matched the medical records of all children admitted with FS over 5 years and the contemporary records for all admissions for febrile illnesses associated with influenza, adenovirus, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and rotavirus to calculate the RR of FS following these viral infections. For patients admitted for a first FS, we carried multivariate analysis for type of viral infection, age of onset, family history, complex FS features and maximum temperature during the episode, to identify the risk factors for recurrence.

RESULTS

There were 923 admissions for FS, of which 565 were for first seizures. The five most common viruses in FS were influenza (163/923, 17.6%), adenovirus (63/923, 6.8%), parainfluenza (55/923, 6%), RSV (25/923, 2.7%) and rotavirus (12/923, 1.3%). Incidences of FS in febrile illnesses due to these viruses were 20.8% (163/785) for influenza, 20.6% (55/267) for parainfluenza, 18.4% (63/343) for adenovirus, 5.3% (25/468) for RSV and 4.3% (12/280) for rotavirus. Complex FS occurred in 20.6% (n = 191) and the risk of developing complex FS was similar for the five viruses. Overall recurrence rate was 20.5% and was not predicted by type of viral infection.

CONCLUSION

The risk of developing FS is similar with influenza, adenovirus or parainfluenza and is higher than with RSV or rotavirus. Type of viral infection is not important in predicting complex features or future recurrences.

摘要

目的

通过比较患常见病毒感染后发生热性惊厥(FS)的相对风险(RR)及后续复发风险,探讨病毒在热性惊厥中的作用。

方法

我们将5年间所有因FS入院儿童的病历与同期因流感、腺病毒、副流感、呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)和轮状病毒相关发热性疾病入院的所有记录进行匹配,以计算这些病毒感染后发生FS的RR。对于首次因FS入院的患者,我们对病毒感染类型、发病年龄、家族史、复杂性FS特征及发作期间最高体温进行多因素分析,以确定复发的危险因素。

结果

有923例因FS入院,其中565例为首次发作。FS中五种最常见的病毒为流感(163/923,17.6%)、腺病毒(63/923,6.8%)、副流感(55/923,6%)、RSV(25/923,2.7%)和轮状病毒(12/923,1.3%)。这些病毒所致发热性疾病中FS的发生率分别为:流感20.8%(163/785)、副流感20.6%(55/267)、腺病毒18.4%(63/343)、RSV 5.3%(25/468)、轮状病毒4.3%(12/280)。复杂性FS发生率为20.6%(n = 191),这五种病毒发生复杂性FS的风险相似。总体复发率为20.5%,且不受病毒感染类型的预测。

结论

患流感、腺病毒或副流感后发生FS的风险相似,且高于患RSV或轮状病毒后的风险。病毒感染类型对预测复杂性特征或未来复发并不重要。

相似文献

3
Viral etiological causes of febrile seizures for respiratory pathogens (EFES Study).发热性惊厥的病毒病因学(EFES 研究)。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(2):496-502. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1526588. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
6
Influenza A and febrile seizures in childhood.甲型流感与儿童热性惊厥
Pediatr Neurol. 2006 Dec;35(6):395-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2006.07.005.
7
Respiratory and Enteric Virus Detection in Children.儿童呼吸道和肠道病毒检测
J Child Neurol. 2017 Jan;32(1):84-93. doi: 10.1177/0883073816670820. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Influenza virus and febrile convulsions.流感病毒与热性惊厥。
J Infect Dis. 2004 Feb 1;189(3):564; author reply 564-5. doi: 10.1086/381154.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验