• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康研究中潜在参与者的知情同意书可读性与教育水平

Consent form readability and educational levels of potential participants in mental health research.

作者信息

Christopher Paul P, Foti Mary Ellen, Roy-Bujnowski Kristen, Appelbaum Paul S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Brown Medical School, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Blvd., Providence, RI 02906, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Feb;58(2):227-32. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.2.227.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2007.58.2.227
PMID:17287380
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Poor readability of informed consent forms has been a persistent problem in clinical research. The low educational attainments of many patients with mental illness might suggest a still greater problem in mental health settings. To explore this potential disparity, this study sought to determine whether the informed consent forms used in research approved by the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health were written at a grade level that was higher than that achieved by potential study participants.

METHODS

The readability (grade level necessary to read text) of informed consent forms for 154 studies was calculated with several standard formulas. Readability scores were stratified on the basis of the risk level of the study from which the consent form was taken. These data were then compared with data on the maximum attained grade level of potential participants aged 19 years or older.

RESULTS

The overall mean readability scores for the informed consent forms, as determined by the four methods, ranged from grade levels 12 to 14.5. Furthermore, the mean readability scores increased with higher risk levels of the studies. Approximately 35% of potential participants had not graduated from high school, 37% had graduated from high school or obtained a GED, and 28% had some education beyond the 12th grade.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate poor readability of informed consent forms used in research approved by the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health and highlight a mismatch between consent form readability and the educational level of potential study participants. The findings suggest that methods of reducing the complexity of forms, as part of improving the overall consent process, are much needed.

摘要

目的

知情同意书可读性差一直是临床研究中的一个长期问题。许多精神疾病患者教育程度较低,这可能意味着在心理健康领域存在更严重的问题。为了探究这一潜在差异,本研究试图确定马萨诸塞州心理健康部批准的研究中使用的知情同意书的编写年级水平是否高于潜在研究参与者所达到的年级水平。

方法

使用几种标准公式计算了154项研究的知情同意书的可读性(阅读文本所需的年级水平)。根据同意书所来自研究的风险水平对可读性得分进行分层。然后将这些数据与19岁及以上潜在参与者所达到的最高年级水平的数据进行比较。

结果

通过四种方法确定的知情同意书的总体平均可读性得分在12年级至14.5年级之间。此外,平均可读性得分随着研究风险水平的提高而增加。约35%的潜在参与者未高中毕业,37%的人高中毕业或获得同等学历,28%的人接受过12年级以上的教育。

结论

这些数据表明马萨诸塞州心理健康部批准的研究中使用的知情同意书可读性差,并突出了同意书可读性与潜在研究参与者教育水平之间的不匹配。研究结果表明,作为改进整体同意过程的一部分,非常需要降低表格复杂性的方法。

相似文献

1
Consent form readability and educational levels of potential participants in mental health research.心理健康研究中潜在参与者的知情同意书可读性与教育水平
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Feb;58(2):227-32. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.2.227.
2
Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.大学资助研究中的同意书可读性。
J Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;42(6):606-11.
3
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.知情同意书的可读性标准与实际可读性对比
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212.
4
Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.研究知情同意书:一项评估可读性及实现改变的可操作性的研究。
J Investig Med. 1995 Oct;43(5):459-67.
5
Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.研究参与者是否真的得到了充分告知?研究中使用的知情同意书的可读性。
Ethics Behav. 1991;1(4):239-52. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0104_2.
6
Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.儿科生物医学研究知情同意书的可读性。
Pediatrics. 1990 Jan;85(1):58-62.
7
Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability.同意书:如何确定并提高其可读性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Nov-Dec;19(10):1523-8.
8
[Readability of informed consent forms for subjects participating in biomedical research: updating is required].[参与生物医学研究受试者的知情同意书可读性:需要更新]
Presse Med. 2005 Jan 15;34(1):13-8. doi: 10.1016/s0755-4982(05)83877-1.
9
Contents and readability of currently used surgical/procedure informed consent forms in Nigerian tertiary health institutions.尼日利亚三级医疗机构目前使用的手术/操作知情同意书的内容与可读性。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2011 Jul-Sep;14(3):311-7. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.86775.
10
Informed consent forms for clinical and research imaging procedures: how much do patients understand?临床和研究成像程序的知情同意书:患者理解多少?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Feb;164(2):493-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839996.

引用本文的文献

1
The literacy barrier in clinical trial consents: a retrospective analysis.临床试验知情同意书中的文化程度障碍:一项回顾性分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 13;75:102814. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102814. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Characterizing altruistic motivation in potential volunteers for SARS-CoV-2 challenge trials.描述 SARS-CoV-2 挑战试验潜在志愿者的利他动机。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0275823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275823. eCollection 2022.
3
Informed consent in psychiatry outpatients.精神病学门诊中的知情同意。
Indian J Med Res. 2020 Jan;151(1):35-41. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1036_18.
4
The quality of consent form structure in biomedical research: a study from Jordan and Sudan.生物医学研究中知情同意书结构的质量:来自约旦和苏丹的一项研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Sep 2;12:727-731. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S219316. eCollection 2019.
5
Current State of Electronic Consent Processes in Behavioral Health: Outcomes from an Observational Study.行为健康领域电子同意流程的现状:一项观察性研究的结果
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1607-1616. eCollection 2017.
6
Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.澳大利亚同意程序的进展
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Jun;15(2):243-257. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9843-z. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Sense and readability: participant information sheets for research studies.意义与可读性:研究项目的参与者信息表
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;208(2):189-94. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.156687. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
8
Addressing risks to advance mental health research.解决推进心理健康研究的风险。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;70(12):1363-71. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2105.
9
Readability of standard appointment letters.标准预约信的可读性。
Ment Health Fam Med. 2010 Jun;7(2):101-6.
10
Responsible governance for mental health research in low resource countries.资源匮乏国家精神健康研究的负责任治理。
PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001126. Epub 2011 Nov 22.