Leiby D A, Fortier A H, Crawford R M, Schreiber R D, Nacy C A
Department of Cellular Immunology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
Infect Immun. 1992 Jan;60(1):84-9. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.1.84-89.1992.
The role(s) of gamma interferon (IFN-gamma), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), and interleukin-4 (IL-4) in establishment and maintenance of protective immunity to Francisella tularensis LVS in mice (C3H/HeN) was examined by selective removal of these cytokines in vivo with neutralizing antibodies. The 50% lethal dose (LD50) for mice infected intradermally with F. tularensis alone was 136,000 CFU; treatment of mice with anti-IFN-gamma or anti-TNF-alpha at the time of infection significantly reduced (P much less than 0.05) the LD50 to 2 and 5 CFU, respectively. Abrogation of protective immunity, however, was effective only when anti-IFN-gamma or anti-TNF-alpha was administered prior to day 3 postinfection. In contrast, the LD50 for mice treated with anti-IL-4 was repeatedly higher (555,000 CFU) than for controls; this difference, however, was not significant (P greater than 0.05). Thus, IL-4 may be detrimental, while IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha were clearly crucial to the establishment of protective immunity to F. tularensis during a primary infection. The importance of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha during a secondary immune response to F. tularensis was also investigated. Spleen cells from immune mice passively transfer protective immunity to recipient mice in the absence of confounding antibody-mediated immunity. This passive transfer of immunity, however, was abrogated by treatment of recipient mice with anti-IFN-gamma or anti-TNF-alpha at the time of challenge infection. That anticytokines effectively abrogate protective immunity very early in the course of infection with F. tularensis suggests that T-cell-dependent activation of macrophages for microbicidal activity is unlikely. These T-cell-independent events early in the course of infection may suppress bacterial replication until a T-cell-dependent response ultimately clears the bacteria.
通过用中和抗体在体内选择性去除这些细胞因子,研究了γ干扰素(IFN-γ)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-4(IL-4)在小鼠(C3H/HeN)对土拉弗朗西斯菌LVS建立和维持保护性免疫中的作用。单独经皮内感染土拉弗朗西斯菌的小鼠的50%致死剂量(LD50)为136,000 CFU;在感染时用抗IFN-γ或抗TNF-α处理小鼠,可使LD50分别显著降低(P远小于0.05)至2 CFU和5 CFU。然而,仅在感染后第3天之前给予抗IFN-γ或抗TNF-α时,保护性免疫的消除才有效。相比之下,用抗IL-4处理的小鼠的LD50反复高于对照组(555,000 CFU);然而,这种差异不显著(P大于0.05)。因此,IL-4可能具有有害作用,而IFN-γ和TNF-α对于初次感染期间对土拉弗朗西斯菌建立保护性免疫显然至关重要。还研究了IFN-γ和TNF-α在对土拉弗朗西斯菌的二次免疫应答中的重要性。在不存在混淆的抗体介导免疫的情况下,免疫小鼠的脾细胞可将保护性免疫被动转移给受体小鼠。然而,在攻击感染时用抗IFN-γ或抗TNF-α处理受体小鼠可消除这种免疫的被动转移。抗细胞因子在土拉弗朗西斯菌感染过程的早期就能有效消除保护性免疫,这表明不太可能存在T细胞依赖性激活巨噬细胞以发挥杀菌活性的情况。感染过程早期这些不依赖T细胞的事件可能会抑制细菌复制,直到T细胞依赖性应答最终清除细菌。