Cookson John, Keck Paul E, Ketter Terence A, Macfadden Wayne
The Department of Psychiatry, Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Mar;22(2):93-100. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3280119dfb.
The objectives of this analysis are to elucidate the clinical significance of antidepressant effects with quetiapine by evaluating number needed to treat as well as time to response and remission with quetiapine monotherapy in patients with acute bipolar depression. A post-hoc analysis was conducted of 542 patients with bipolar I or II disorder, (moderate to severe depression), randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with quetiapine 600 mg/day (n=180), quetiapine 300 mg/day (n=181), or placebo (n=181). Number needed to treat, time to response (> or =50% reduction from baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score) and time to remission (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score < or =12) were evaluated. Response rates at week 8 were 58.2 and 57.6% for quetiapine 600 and 300 mg/day, respectively, and 36.1% for placebo (P<0.001). Remission rates were 52.9% for both quetiapine groups and 28.4% for placebo (P<0.001). The number needed to treat was five for both response and remission for quetiapine (600 and 300 mg/day) compared with placebo. Median time to response and remission were significantly shorter with quetiapine 600 and 300 mg/day than placebo. No between-group difference was found in the incidence of treatment-emergent mania or hypomania (quetiapine 600 mg/day: 2.2%, quetiapine 300 mg/day: 3.9, and placebo: 3.9%). In conclusion, quetiapine compared with placebo significantly reduces time to response and remission compared with placebo, and has a favorable number needed to treat.
本分析的目的是通过评估治疗所需人数以及急性双相抑郁患者接受喹硫平单药治疗的起效时间和缓解时间,来阐明喹硫平抗抑郁作用的临床意义。对542例I型或II型双相情感障碍(中度至重度抑郁)患者进行了一项事后分析,这些患者被随机分配接受为期8周的双盲治疗,分别为每日600毫克喹硫平(n = 180)、每日300毫克喹硫平(n = 181)或安慰剂(n = 181)。评估了治疗所需人数、起效时间(蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表总分较基线降低≥50%)和缓解时间(蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表总分≤12)。第8周时,每日600毫克和300毫克喹硫平的有效率分别为58.2%和57.6%,安慰剂组为36.1%(P<0.001)。两个喹硫平组的缓解率均为52.9%,安慰剂组为28.4%(P<0.001)。与安慰剂相比,喹硫平(600毫克/天和300毫克/天)治疗有效和达到缓解的治疗所需人数均为5。每日600毫克和300毫克喹硫平的起效时间和缓解时间中位数均显著短于安慰剂。在治疗中出现躁狂或轻躁狂的发生率方面,各治疗组之间未发现差异(每日600毫克喹硫平组:2.2%,每日300毫克喹硫平组:3.9%,安慰剂组:3.9%)。总之,与安慰剂相比,喹硫平能显著缩短起效时间和缓解时间,且治疗所需人数较理想。