Reimer Kirkham Sheryl, Baumbusch Jennifer L, Schultz Annette S H, Anderson Joan M
Nursing Department, Trinity Western University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007 Jan-Mar;30(1):26-40. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200701000-00004.
Although not without its critics, evidence-based practice is widely espoused as supporting professional nursing practice. Engaging with the evidence-based practice discourse from a vantage point offered by the critical perspectives of postcolonial feminism, the incomplete epistemologies and limitations of the standardization characteristic of the evidences-based movement are analyzed. Critical analysis of evidence is suggested, such that it recognizes the evidence generated from multiple paradigms of inquiry, along with contextual interpretation and application of this evidence. We examine how broader interpretations of evidence might contribute to nursing knowledge development and translation for transformative professional nursing practice, and ultimately to address persistent health disparities within the complex context of healthcare delivery.
尽管循证实践并非没有批评者,但它被广泛支持用于专业护理实践。从后殖民女权主义的批判性视角所提供的有利位置参与循证实践话语,分析了循证运动标准化特征的不完整认识论和局限性。建议对证据进行批判性分析,使其认识到从多种探究范式中产生的证据,以及对该证据的情境解释和应用。我们研究对证据的更广泛解释如何有助于护理知识的发展和转化,以实现变革性的专业护理实践,并最终在复杂的医疗服务背景下解决持续存在的健康差距问题。