Suppr超能文献

单人病房有助于预防重症监护病房中的医院获得性血流感染以及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的交叉传播。

Single rooms may help to prevent nosocomial bloodstream infection and cross-transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units.

作者信息

Bracco David, Dubois Marc-Jacques, Bouali Redouane, Eggimann Philippe

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Room D10-145-3, 1650 Cedar Avenue, H3G 1A4, Montreal, Canada.

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Montreal University Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2007 May;33(5):836-840. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0559-5. Epub 2007 Mar 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Nosocomial infections remain a major problem in intensive care units. Several authorities have recommended housing patients in single rooms to prevent cross-transmission of potential pathogens, but this issue is currently debated. The aim of the present study was to compare the rate of nosocomial cross-contamination between patients hosted in single rooms versus bay rooms.

DESIGN

Prospective observational data acquisition over 2.5 years.

SETTING

A 14-bed medico-surgical ICU, composed of six single-bed rooms plus a six-bed and a two-bed bay room served by the same staff.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

All patients admitted from 1 July 2002 to 31 December 2004.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in admitted patients was 1.1% and acquisition rate 2.4%. The incidence density of MRSA acquisition was 4.1 [95% CI 2.7-6.3]/1,000 patient-days in bay rooms versus 1.3 [0.5-3.4]/1,000 patient-days in single rooms (p<0.001). Pseudomonas spp. acquisition rate was 3.9 [2.5-6.1]/1,000 patient-days in bay rooms versus 0.7 [0.2-2.4]/1,000 patient-days in single rooms (p<0.001), and Candida spp. colonization was 38.4 [33.3-44.1]/1,000 patient-days in bay rooms versus 13.8 [10.2-18.6]/1,000 patient-days (p<0.001). By multivariate analysis, the relative risk of MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida spp. acquisition in single rooms or cubicles versus bay rooms was 0.65, 0.61 and 0.75 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that in an institution where MRSA is not hyperendemic, infection control measures may be more effective to prevent cross-transmission of microorganisms in patients housed in single rooms.

摘要

目的

医院感染仍是重症监护病房的一个主要问题。一些权威机构建议将患者安置在单人病房以防止潜在病原体的交叉传播,但目前这一问题仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较单人病房与多人病房中患者的医院交叉污染率。

设计

2.5年的前瞻性观察数据采集。

地点

一个有14张床位的内科-外科重症监护病房,由6个单人病房以及一个6人间和一个2人间的多人病房组成,由同一组医护人员负责。

患者和参与者

2002年7月1日至2004年12月31日期间收治的所有患者。

干预措施

无。

测量和结果

入院患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的患病率为1.1%,获得率为2.4%。多人病房中MRSA获得的发病密度为4.1[95%可信区间2.7 - 6.3]/1000患者日,而单人病房为1.3[0.5 - 3.4]/1000患者日(p<0.001)。假单胞菌属的获得率在多人病房为3.9[2.5 - 6.1]/1000患者日,在单人病房为0.7[0.2 - 2.4]/1000患者日(p<0.001),念珠菌属的定植率在多人病房为38.4[33.3 - 44.1]/1000患者日,在单人病房为13.8[10.2 - 18.6]/1000患者日(p<0.001)。通过多变量分析,单人病房或小隔间中获得MRSA、铜绿假单胞菌和念珠菌属的相对风险分别为0.65、0.61和0.75。

结论

这些数据表明,在一个MRSA并非高度流行的机构中,感染控制措施可能对防止单人病房中患者的微生物交叉传播更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验