• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽管存在孢子休眠现象,但细菌的分子进化速率相对恒定。

Rates of molecular evolution in bacteria are relatively constant despite spore dormancy.

作者信息

Maughan Heather

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.

出版信息

Evolution. 2007 Feb;61(2):280-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00026.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00026.x
PMID:17348939
Abstract

Rates of molecular evolution are known to vary considerably among lineages, partially due to differences in life-history traits such as generation time. The generation-time effect has been well documented in some eukaryotes, but its prevalence in prokaryotes is unknown. "Because many species of Firmicute bacteria spend long periods of time as metabolically dormant spores, which could result in fewer DNA substitutions per unit time, they present an excellent system for testing predictions of the molecular clock hypothesis." To test whether spore-forming bacteria evolve more slowly than their non-spore-forming relatives, I used phylogenetic methods to determine if there were differences in rates of amino acid substitution between spore-forming and non-spore-forming lineages of Firmicute bacteria. Although rates of evolution do vary among lineages, I find no evidence for an effect of spore-formation on evolutionary rate and, furthermore, evolutionary rates are similar to those calculated for enteric bacteria. These results support the notion that variation in generation time does not affect evolutionary rates in bacterial lineages.

摘要

已知分子进化速率在不同谱系间差异很大,部分原因是诸如世代时间等生活史特征的差异。世代时间效应在一些真核生物中已有充分记载,但在原核生物中的普遍性尚不清楚。“由于许多厚壁菌门细菌会以代谢休眠孢子的形式存在很长时间,这可能导致单位时间内的DNA替换较少,所以它们是检验分子钟假说预测的绝佳系统。”为了测试形成孢子的细菌是否比不形成孢子的亲缘细菌进化得更慢,我使用系统发育方法来确定厚壁菌门细菌中形成孢子和不形成孢子的谱系之间氨基酸替换率是否存在差异。尽管进化速率在不同谱系间确实存在差异,但我没有发现孢子形成对进化速率有影响的证据,此外,进化速率与针对肠道细菌计算出的速率相似。这些结果支持了世代时间的变化不会影响细菌谱系进化速率这一观点。

相似文献

1
Rates of molecular evolution in bacteria are relatively constant despite spore dormancy.尽管存在孢子休眠现象,但细菌的分子进化速率相对恒定。
Evolution. 2007 Feb;61(2):280-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00026.x.
2
A generation-time effect on the rate of molecular evolution in bacteria.细菌中世代时间对分子进化速率的影响。
Evolution. 2015 Mar;69(3):643-52. doi: 10.1111/evo.12597. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
3
Genome-scale rates of evolutionary change in bacteria.细菌基因组规模的进化变化率。
Microb Genom. 2016 Nov 30;2(11):e000094. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000094. eCollection 2016 Nov.
4
I will survive: DNA protection in bacterial spores.我将存活:细菌芽孢中的DNA保护
Trends Microbiol. 2007 Apr;15(4):172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
5
Sporulation genes in members of the low G+C Gram-type-positive phylogenetic branch ( Firmicutes).低G+C含量革兰氏阳性系统发育分支(厚壁菌门)成员中的孢子形成基因。
Arch Microbiol. 2004 Oct;182(2-3):182-92. doi: 10.1007/s00203-004-0696-y. Epub 2004 Aug 31.
6
A mitogenomic timescale for birds detects variable phylogenetic rates of molecular evolution and refutes the standard molecular clock.一个针对鸟类的有丝分裂基因组时间尺度检测到分子进化的系统发育速率存在差异,并驳斥了标准分子钟。
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Sep;23(9):1731-40. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl038. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
7
Investigating Evolutionary Rate Variation in Bacteria.研究细菌的进化速率变化。
J Mol Evol. 2019 Dec;87(9-10):317-326. doi: 10.1007/s00239-019-09912-5. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Phosphoproteome dynamics mediate revival of bacterial spores.磷酸化蛋白质组动力学介导细菌芽孢的复苏。
BMC Biol. 2015 Sep 17;13:76. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0184-7.
9
Carotenoid biosynthetic pathway: molecular phylogenies and evolutionary behavior of crt genes in eubacteria.类胡萝卜素生物合成途径:真细菌中crt基因的分子系统发育和进化行为
Gene. 2005 Jan 17;345(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.11.038. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
10
Sociality and the rate of molecular evolution.社会性与分子进化速率
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Jun;22(6):1393-402. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi133. Epub 2005 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Principles of seed banks and the emergence of complexity from dormancy.种子银行的原则与休眠引发的复杂性出现
Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 10;12(1):4807. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24733-1.
2
Investigating Evolutionary Rate Variation in Bacteria.研究细菌的进化速率变化。
J Mol Evol. 2019 Dec;87(9-10):317-326. doi: 10.1007/s00239-019-09912-5. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
3
Complete genome sequences of two strains of Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue from Ghana, Africa: Identical genome sequences in samples isolated more than 7 years apart.
来自非洲加纳的两株 pertenue 亚种梅毒螺旋体的全基因组序列:相隔7年以上分离的样本中基因组序列相同。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Sep 8;11(9):e0005894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005894. eCollection 2017 Sep.
4
Patterns of Substitution Rate Variation at Many Nuclear Loci in Two Species Trios in the Brassicaceae Partitioned with ANOVA.通过方差分析划分十字花科两个物种三联体中多个核基因座的替换率变异模式。
J Mol Evol. 2016 Oct;83(3-4):97-109. doi: 10.1007/s00239-016-9752-x. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
5
Genetic Variability Under the Seedbank Coalescent.种子库溯祖模型下的遗传变异性
Genetics. 2015 Jul;200(3):921-34. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.176818. Epub 2015 May 7.
6
Population expansions shared among coexisting bacterial lineages are revealed by genetic evidence.遗传证据揭示了共存细菌谱系间共享的种群扩张。
PeerJ. 2014 Dec 16;2:e696. doi: 10.7717/peerj.696. eCollection 2014.
7
Divergence and phylogeny of Firmicutes from the Cuatro Ciénegas Basin, Mexico: a window to an ancient ocean.墨西哥四色湖盆厚壁菌门的分歧与系统发育:古老海洋的一扇窗。
Astrobiology. 2012 Jul;12(7):674-84. doi: 10.1089/ast.2011.0685.
8
Parallel Evolution and Horizontal Gene Transfer of the pst Operon in Firmicutes from Oligotrophic Environments.寡营养环境中厚壁菌门pst操纵子的平行进化与水平基因转移
Int J Evol Biol. 2011 Mar 3;2011:781642. doi: 10.4061/2011/781642.
9
Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy.微生物种子库:休眠的生态和进化意义。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Feb;9(2):119-30. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2504.
10
Syphilis at the crossroad of phylogenetics and paleopathology.梅毒处于系统发生学和古病理学的十字路口。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Jan 5;4(1):e575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000575.