Thomas P, Mathur P, Gottesman I I, Nagpal R, Nimgaonkar V L, Deshpande S N
Indo-US project "Genetic Susceptibility in Schizophrenia", Department of Psychiatry, Dr. RML Hospital, Delhi, India.
Schizophr Res. 2007 May;92(1-3):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.01.017. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
Demographic, clinical and familial factors may plausibly influence the manifestation of hallucinations. It is unclear if the pattern of the effects is similar in different environmental/cultural settings.
To evaluate factors associated with hallucination from a demographic, clinical and familial perspective in two distinct cultural settings.
Patients with a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia (SZ) or schizoaffective disorder (SZA) were diagnosed systematically using DSM IV criteria. Two independent samples were recruited in India and USA using identical inclusion/exclusion criteria and assessment procedures (n=1287 patients total; 807 Indian and 480 US participants). The association of key demographic and clinical factors with hallucinations of different modalities was examined. To evaluate the impact of familial factors, we separately analyzed correlations among affected sibling pairs (ASPs, n=136, Indian; n=77, US).
The prevalence of different modalities of hallucinations differed in the Indian and US samples, though the rank order of frequency was similar. The pattern of associations between selected variables and the risk of hallucinations was different across cultures, except for some correlations with indices of severity. No significant concordance was observed among the ASPs after correcting for multiple comparisons.
The factors associated with hallucinations vary across environments. Our results are consistent with a multi-factorial etiology of psychopathology, but re-direct attention to endophenotypic features in the causal chain that precede the symptoms themselves.
人口统计学、临床和家族因素可能会对幻觉的表现产生影响。目前尚不清楚在不同的环境/文化背景下,这种影响模式是否相似。
从人口统计学、临床和家族角度评估两种不同文化背景下与幻觉相关的因素。
采用DSM-IV标准对临床诊断为精神分裂症(SZ)或分裂情感性障碍(SZA)的患者进行系统诊断。在印度和美国使用相同的纳入/排除标准和评估程序招募了两个独立样本(共1287名患者;807名印度参与者和480名美国参与者)。研究了关键人口统计学和临床因素与不同形式幻觉之间的关联。为了评估家族因素的影响,我们分别分析了患病同胞对(ASP,印度n = 136;美国n = 77)之间的相关性。
印度和美国样本中不同形式幻觉的患病率有所不同,尽管频率排序相似。除了一些与严重程度指标的相关性外,不同文化背景下所选变量与幻觉风险之间的关联模式不同。在进行多重比较校正后,患病同胞对之间未观察到显著的一致性。
与幻觉相关的因素因环境而异。我们的结果与精神病理学的多因素病因学一致,但将注意力重新引向症状出现之前因果链中的内表型特征。