Verbruggen Frederick, Liefooghe Baptist, Vandierendonck André, Demanet Jelle
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):342-56. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.342.
In the task-switching literature, it has frequently been demonstrated that although advance task preparation reduces the switch cost, it never really eliminates the switch cost. This remaining residual switch cost received much attention, and it has been argued that advance preparation is restricted in nature. In the present study, the role of task-cue presentation in the establishment of the residual switch cost was investigated. In 4 experiments, the cue was removed during the preparation interval, and it was hypothesized that this would encourage participants to complete advance task preparation. The results of all 4 experiments provided support for this hypothesis: When the cue was presented for a short time and then removed, the residual switch cost completely disappeared. This was found for different cue types. Furthermore, Experiment 3 demonstrated that it was not the presence of the cue itself but merely differences in advance task preparation that caused the effects. This suggests that advance task preparation is not as restricted in nature as previously assumed.
在任务转换的文献中,经常有研究表明,尽管提前进行任务准备可以降低转换成本,但它从未真正消除转换成本。这种剩余的残余转换成本受到了广泛关注,并且有人认为提前准备在本质上是有限制的。在本研究中,我们调查了任务线索呈现对残余转换成本形成的作用。在4个实验中,线索在准备间隔期间被移除,并且我们假设这将促使参与者完成提前的任务准备。所有4个实验的结果都支持了这一假设:当线索短暂呈现然后被移除时,残余转换成本完全消失了。不同类型的线索都是如此。此外,实验3表明,导致这种效应的不是线索本身的存在,而仅仅是提前任务准备的差异。这表明提前任务准备在本质上并不像之前所假设的那样受到限制。