Keegstra A L, Knijff W A, Post W J, Goorhuis-Brouwer S M
Departement of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 May;71(5):815-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
Analysis of a clinical population referred for language analysis in terms of background variables and extent of language problems.
Descriptive study.
Children referred to a speech and hearing clinic because of assumed language problems were analyzed with standardized tests for language comprehension (Dutch version of the Reynell Developmental Comprehension Scale) and language production (Schlichting test for sentence development). A language problem was defined when the language quotient score differed 1.3S.D. from the mean (quotient scores< or =80). Furthermore, potential risk factors for language problems were compiled (gender, prematurity, birth weight, family composition, familial aggregation, parental education and daycare/home care).
Two hundred forty children, aged between 2 and 5 years of age were included in the study. A reliable language comprehension quotient (LCQ) was obtained in 204 children (85%) and a reliable sentence development quotient (SDQ) in 206 children (85%). In 35% of the children who were assumed to have language problems, adequate language development was found. The children with language problems differed from the children without language problems with regard to language problems in the family (more family aggregation). Also the former more frequently had parents with a low level of education and more often did not attend daycare. The total referred group differed from the Dutch population with regard to gender (more boys), more instances of low birth weight, more parents with middle and high educational level, more two-parent households, fewer siblings, and more frequent attendance at daycare.
Parents with a low level of education more frequently have children with language problems. However, parents with a middle and high level of education are more often concerned about the language development of their child. As a consequence, the overestimation of language problems is a real issue in clinical practice. Normal variations in language development often are not considered. The analysis of compiled background variables indicates that language problems are genetically influenced (gender and family aggregation). Language input also is of importance (interactions with a language-competent parent or caregiver and peers): children with language problems less often attended daycare.
根据背景变量和语言问题程度,对转介进行语言分析的临床人群进行分析。
描述性研究。
因假定存在语言问题而被转介至言语与听力诊所的儿童,使用语言理解标准化测试(荷兰版瑞尼尔发育理解量表)和语言表达标准化测试(施利希廷句子发展测试)进行分析。当语言商数得分与平均值相差1.3个标准差(商数得分≤80)时,定义为存在语言问题。此外,汇总语言问题的潜在风险因素(性别、早产、出生体重、家庭构成、家族聚集性、父母教育程度和日托/家庭照料情况)。
240名年龄在2至5岁之间的儿童纳入研究。204名儿童(85%)获得了可靠的语言理解商数(LCQ),206名儿童(85%)获得了可靠的句子发展商数(SDQ)。在假定存在语言问题的儿童中,35%被发现语言发育正常。有语言问题的儿童与无语言问题的儿童在家庭语言问题方面存在差异(家族聚集性更强)。前者的父母教育程度较低的情况也更常见,且较少参加日托。总体转介组与荷兰人群在性别方面存在差异(男孩更多)、低出生体重的情况更多、父母教育程度为中高水平的更多、双亲家庭更多、兄弟姐妹更少,且参加日托的频率更高。
教育程度低的父母其孩子出现语言问题的情况更常见。然而,教育程度为中高水平的父母更常关注孩子的语言发展。因此,在临床实践中,对语言问题的高估是一个实际问题。语言发展的正常变异往往未被考虑。对汇总的背景变量进行分析表明,语言问题受遗传影响(性别和家族聚集性)。语言输入也很重要(与有语言能力的父母、照料者和同伴的互动):有语言问题的儿童较少参加日托。