Klein Hélène, Garneau Line, Banderali Umberto, Simoes Manuel, Parent Lucie, Sauvé Rémy
Department of Physiology, Membrane Protein Study Group, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7.
J Gen Physiol. 2007 Apr;129(4):299-315. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609726. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
In this work we address the question of the KCa3.1 channel pore structure in the closed configuration in relation to the contribution of the C-terminal end of the S6 segments to the Ca(2+)-dependent gating process. Our results based on SCAM (substituted cysteine accessibility method) experiments first demonstrate that the S6 transmembrane segment of the open KCa3.1 channel contains two distinct functional domains delimited by V282 with MTSEA and MTSET binding leading to a total channel inhibition at positions V275, T278, and V282 and to a steep channel activation at positions A283 and A286. The rates of modification by MTSEA (diameter 4.6 A) of the 275C (central cavity) and 286C residues (S6 C-terminal end) for the closed channel configuration were found to differ by less than sevenfold, whereas experiments performed with the larger MTSET reagent (diameter 5.8 A) resulted in modification rates 10(3)-10(4) faster for cysteines at 286 compared with 275. Consistent with these results, the modification rates of the cavity lining 275C residue by MTSEA, Et-Hg(+), and Ag(+) appeared poorly state dependent, whereas modification rates by MTSET were 10(3) faster for the open than the closed configuration. A SCAM analysis of the channel inner vestibule in the closed state revealed in addition that cysteine residues at 286 were accessible to MTS reagents as large as MTS-PtrEA, a result supported by the observation that binding of MTSET to cysteines at positions 283 or 286 could neither sterically nor electrostatically block the access of MTSEA to the closed channel cavity (275C). It follows that the closed KCa3.1 structure can hardly be accountable by an inverted teepee-like structure as described for KcsA, but is better represented by a narrow passage centered at V282 (equivalent to V474 in Shaker) connecting the channel central cavity to the cytosolic medium. This passage would not be however restrictive to the diffusion of small reagents such as MTSEA, Et-Hg(+), and Ag(+), arguing against the C-terminal end of S6 forming an obstructive barrier to the diffusion of K(+) ions for the closed channel configuration.
在本研究中,我们探讨了KCa3.1通道处于关闭构象时的孔结构问题,以及S6段C末端对Ca(2+)依赖性门控过程的贡献。我们基于半胱氨酸替代可及性方法(SCAM)实验的结果首先表明,开放的KCa3.1通道的S6跨膜段包含两个不同的功能域,由V282界定,MTSEA和MTSET结合导致在V275、T278和V282位置通道完全抑制,在A283和A286位置通道急剧激活。对于关闭通道构象,发现MTSEA(直径4.6 Å)对275C(中央腔)和286C残基(S6 C末端)的修饰速率差异小于7倍,而使用较大的MTSET试剂(直径5.8 Å)进行的实验结果显示,与275相比,286位半胱氨酸的修饰速率快10(3)-10(4)倍。与这些结果一致,MTSEA、Et-Hg(+)和Ag(+)对中央腔衬里275C残基的修饰速率似乎与状态无关,而MTSET对开放构象的修饰速率比对关闭构象快10(3)倍。此外,对关闭状态下通道内部前庭的SCAM分析表明,286位的半胱氨酸残基可被大小如MTS-PtrEA的MTS试剂所及,这一结果得到如下观察结果的支持:MTSET与283或286位半胱氨酸的结合既不能在空间上也不能在静电上阻止MTSEA进入关闭通道腔(275C)。由此可见,关闭的KCa3.1结构很难用KcsA中描述的倒锥形结构来解释,而更好的表示方式是一个以V282(相当于Shaker中的V474)为中心的狭窄通道,将通道中央腔与胞质介质相连。然而,这个通道对于诸如MTSEA、Et-Hg(+)和Ag(+)等小试剂的扩散不会有限制,这表明S6的C末端不会对关闭通道构象的K(+)离子扩散形成阻碍屏障。