Sices Laura
Division of Behavioral Pediatrics and Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-6038, USA.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007 Feb;28(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31803084c6.
Pediatricians frequently report the use of developmental milestones in monitoring young children's development, despite evidence that use of screening tools improves detection of developmental delays.
Core texts in the field of pediatrics and developmental-behavioral pediatrics were reviewed for content and presentation on child development. Most texts included and many focused on developmental milestones, many with an emphasis on 50th percentile milestone data. Problems and limitations in the use of 50th percentile milestones to monitor young children's development and to identify children whose development is suspicious for delay, include questionable utility in clinical decision making and the potential to increase parental anxiety.
The recommendation is made to reconsider a focus on 50th percentile milestone data in pediatric training and practice, in favor of measures that have better clinical utility and are more psychometrically sound.
A conceptual approach to the presentation of developmental milestones differentiates the use of the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of age of achievement of skills, based on the clinical purpose of surveillance.
尽管有证据表明使用筛查工具可提高对发育迟缓的检测率,但儿科医生仍经常报告在监测幼儿发育时使用发育里程碑。
对儿科学和发育行为儿科学领域的核心文本进行了审查,以了解有关儿童发育的内容和呈现方式。大多数文本都包含发育里程碑,许多文本还着重介绍了第50百分位数的里程碑数据。使用第50百分位数的里程碑来监测幼儿发育以及识别发育可疑延迟的儿童存在的问题和局限性,包括在临床决策中的效用存疑以及可能增加家长焦虑。
建议在儿科培训和实践中重新考虑对第50百分位数里程碑数据的关注,转而采用具有更好临床效用且在心理测量学上更合理的测量方法。
一种关于发育里程碑呈现的概念性方法,根据监测的临床目的,区分技能达成年龄的第10、第50和第90百分位数的使用。