Larson Greger, Cucchi Thomas, Fujita Masakatsu, Matisoo-Smith Elizabeth, Robins Judith, Anderson Atholl, Rolett Barry, Spriggs Matthew, Dolman Gaynor, Kim Tae-Hun, Thuy Nguyen Thi Dieu, Randi Ettore, Doherty Moira, Due Rokus Awe, Bollt Robert, Djubiantono Tony, Griffin Bion, Intoh Michiko, Keane Emile, Kirch Patrick, Li Kuang-Ti, Morwood Michael, Pedriña Lolita M, Piper Philip J, Rabett Ryan J, Shooter Peter, Van den Bergh Gert, West Eric, Wickler Stephen, Yuan Jing, Cooper Alan, Dobney Keith
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University Biomedical Center, Box 597, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 20;104(12):4834-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607753104. Epub 2007 Mar 14.
Human settlement of Oceania marked the culmination of a global colonization process that began when humans first left Africa at least 90,000 years ago. The precise origins and dispersal routes of the Austronesian peoples and the associated Lapita culture remain contentious, and numerous disparate models of dispersal (based primarily on linguistic, genetic, and archeological data) have been proposed. Here, through the use of mtDNA from 781 modern and ancient Sus specimens, we provide evidence for an early human-mediated translocation of the Sulawesi warty pig (Sus celebensis) to Flores and Timor and two later separate human-mediated dispersals of domestic pig (Sus scrofa) through Island Southeast Asia into Oceania. Of the later dispersal routes, one is unequivocally associated with the Neolithic (Lapita) and later Polynesian migrations and links modern and archeological Javan, Sumatran, Wallacean, and Oceanic pigs with mainland Southeast Asian S. scrofa. Archeological and genetic evidence shows these pigs were certainly introduced to islands east of the Wallace Line, including New Guinea, and that so-called "wild" pigs within this region are most likely feral descendants of domestic pigs introduced by early agriculturalists. The other later pig dispersal links mainland East Asian pigs to western Micronesia, Taiwan, and the Philippines. These results provide important data with which to test current models for human dispersal in the region.
人类对大洋洲的定居标志着一个全球殖民过程的高潮,这个过程始于至少9万年前人类首次离开非洲之时。南岛民族及相关拉皮塔文化的确切起源和扩散路线仍存在争议,人们已经提出了许多不同的扩散模型(主要基于语言、基因和考古数据)。在这里,通过对781个现代和古代野猪样本的线粒体DNA进行分析,我们提供了证据,证明苏拉威西疣猪(Sus celebensis)早期由人类介导转移至弗洛雷斯岛和帝汶岛,以及后来家猪(Sus scrofa)通过东南亚岛屿分两次由人类介导扩散至大洋洲。在后来的扩散路线中,一条明确与新石器时代(拉皮塔)及后来的波利尼西亚迁徙相关,将现代和考古发现的爪哇、苏门答腊、华莱士区及大洋洲的猪与东南亚大陆的野猪联系起来。考古和基因证据表明,这些猪肯定被引入了华莱士线以东的岛屿,包括新几内亚岛,而且该地区所谓的“野生”猪很可能是早期农耕者引入的家猪的野生后代。另一条后来的猪扩散路线则将东亚大陆的猪与密克罗尼西亚西部、台湾和菲律宾联系起来。这些结果提供了重要数据,可用于检验该地区当前的人类扩散模型。