Suppr超能文献

死亡率与职业性辐射暴露:辐射工作者国家登记处的首次分析

Mortality and occupational exposure to radiation: first analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers.

作者信息

Kendall G M, Muirhead C R, MacGibbon B H, O'Hagan J A, Conquest A J, Goodill A A, Butland B K, Fell T P, Jackson D A, Webb M A

机构信息

National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot.

出版信息

BMJ. 1992 Jan 25;304(6821):220-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6821.220.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study cause specific mortality of radiation workers with particular reference to associations between fatal neoplasms and level of exposure to radiation.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

United Kingdom.

SUBJECTS

95,217 radiation workers at major sites of the nuclear industry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Cause of death.

RESULTS

Most standardised mortality ratios were below 100: 83 unlagged, 85 with a 10 year lag for all causes; 84 unlagged, 86 lagged for all cancers; and 80 for all known other causes, indicating a "healthy worker effect." The deficit of lung cancer (75 unlagged, 76 lagged) was significant at the 0.1% level. Standardised mortality ratios were significantly raised (214 unlagged, 303 lagged) for thyroid cancer, but there was no evidence for any trend with external recorded radiation dose. Dose of external radiation and mortality from all cancers were weakly correlated (p = 0.10), and multiple myeloma was more strongly correlated (p = 0.06); for leukaemia, excluding chronic lymphatic, the trend was significant (p = 0.03; all tests one tailed). The central estimates of lifetime risk derived from these data were 10.0% per Sv (90% confidence interval less than 0 to 24%) for all cancers and 0.76% per Sv (0.07 to 2.4%) for leukaemia (excluding chronic lymphatic leukaemia). These are, respectively, 2.5 times and 1.9 times the risk estimates recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection, but 90% confidence intervals are large and the commission's risk factors fall well within the range. The positive trend with dose for all cancers, from which the risk estimate was derived, was not significant. The positive association between leukaemia (except chronic lymphatic leukaemia) was significant and robust in subsidiary analyses. This study showed no association between radiation exposure and prostatic cancer.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence for an association between radiation exposure and mortality from cancer, in particular leukaemia (excluding chronic lymphatic leukaemia) and multiple myeloma, although mortality from these diseases in the study population overall was below that in the general population. The central estimates of risk from this study lie above the most recent estimates of the International Commission on Radiological Protection for leukaemia (excluding chronic lymphatic leukaemia) and for all malignancies. However, the commission's risk estimates are well within the 90% confidence intervals from this study. Analysis of combined cohorts of radiation workers in the United States indicated lower risk estimates than the commission recommends, and when the American data are combined with our analysis the overall risks are close to those estimated by the commission. This first analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers does not provide sufficient evidence to justify a revision in risk estimates for radiological protection purposes.

摘要

目的

研究放射工作人员的特定病因死亡率,特别关注致命性肿瘤与辐射暴露水平之间的关联。

设计

队列研究。

地点

英国。

研究对象

核工业主要场所的95217名放射工作人员。

主要观察指标

死因。

结果

大多数标准化死亡比低于100:所有原因的未滞后标准化死亡比为83,滞后10年的为85;所有癌症的未滞后标准化死亡比为84,滞后的为86;所有已知其他原因的标准化死亡比为80,表明存在“健康工人效应”。肺癌的标准化死亡比(未滞后为75,滞后为76)在0.1%水平上具有显著性。甲状腺癌的标准化死亡比显著升高(未滞后为214,滞后为303),但没有证据表明其与外部记录的辐射剂量存在任何趋势。外部辐射剂量与所有癌症死亡率之间的相关性较弱(p = 0.10),与多发性骨髓瘤的相关性更强(p = 0.06);对于白血病(不包括慢性淋巴细胞白血病),趋势具有显著性(p = 0.03;所有检验均为单尾)。根据这些数据得出的终生风险中心估计值为:所有癌症每西弗为10.0%(90%置信区间小于0至24%),白血病(不包括慢性淋巴细胞白血病)每西弗为0.76%(0.07至2.4%)。这些分别是国际放射防护委员会推荐风险估计值的2.5倍和1.9倍,但90%置信区间较宽,且该委员会的风险因子完全在这个范围内。从中得出风险估计值的所有癌症与剂量的正相关趋势并不显著。在辅助分析中,白血病(慢性淋巴细胞白血病除外)的正相关显著且稳健。本研究未显示辐射暴露与前列腺癌之间存在关联。

结论

有证据表明辐射暴露与癌症死亡率之间存在关联,特别是白血病(不包括慢性淋巴细胞白血病)和多发性骨髓瘤,尽管该研究人群中这些疾病的死亡率总体低于普通人群。本研究的风险中心估计值高于国际放射防护委员会对白血病(不包括慢性淋巴细胞白血病)和所有恶性肿瘤的最新估计值。然而,该委员会的风险估计值完全在本研究的90%置信区间内。对美国放射工作人员合并队列的分析表明,风险估计值低于该委员会的推荐值,当将美国的数据与我们的分析相结合时,总体风险接近该委员会的估计值。对国家放射工作人员登记处的首次分析没有提供足够的证据来证明为放射防护目的而修订风险估计值是合理的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Optimizing Radiotherapy with Immunotherapeutic Approaches.用免疫治疗方法优化放射治疗
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;995:53-71. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-53156-4_3.

本文引用的文献

2
ARFAR: a person years at risk program.ARFAR:一项按人年计算的风险项目。
Br J Ind Med. 1986 Aug;43(8):572-3. doi: 10.1136/oem.43.8.572.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验