• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

添加益生元配方奶粉对足月儿生长及粪便微生物群的影响。

The effect of a prebiotic supplemented formula on growth and stool microbiology of term infants.

作者信息

Costalos C, Kapiki A, Apostolou M, Papathoma E

机构信息

Department of Neonatal Medicine, Alexandra Regional General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 2008 Jan;84(1):45-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.03.001
PMID:17433577
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The intestinal flora of breast-fed infants is generally dominated by bifidobacteria which have beneficial properties. Their presence is due to various compounds of breast milk including prebiotic substances.

AIM

This prospective, double blind, study compared the growth, acceptability and the proportion of bifidobacteria and clostridia in the stool flora of bottle-fed infants randomized to receive a formula with a specific mixture of 0.4 g/100 ml prebiotic galacto- and long-chain fructooligosaccharides or the same formula without added prebiotics.

METHODS

Within 0-14 days after birth at term, healthy bottle-fed infants were enrolled to receive either a prebiotic formula or a standard formula. At recruitment anthropometric measurements were done. These were repeated at the age of 6 and 12 weeks. Stool samples were taken at inclusion and at the age of 6 weeks. The number of bifidobacteria and clostridia was determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

There was good tolerance of the prebiotic formula. Somatic growth was similar in the two groups. Stool frequency was significantly higher in the prebiotic group (P=0.031). Infants in the prebiotic group had also softer stools as compared to the control group (P=0.026). Baseline values of microorganisms at study entry were similar. The percentage of faecal clostridia at the completion of the study was significantly lower in the prebiotic group (P=0.042), while the proportion of faecal bifidobacteria was higher in the prebiotic group as compared to the control group. However this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.262). The percentage of E. coli was lower in the prebiotic group but again this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.312).

CONCLUSION

An infant formula containing prebiotic oligosaccharides is well tolerated, leads to normal somatic growth and suppresses the numbers of clostridia in the faeces with a trend for higher percentage of stool bifidobacteria and lower percentage of E. coli.

摘要

背景

母乳喂养婴儿的肠道菌群通常以具有有益特性的双歧杆菌为主。其存在归因于母乳中的各种成分,包括益生元物质。

目的

这项前瞻性、双盲研究比较了随机接受含0.4 g/100 ml益生元半乳糖和长链低聚果糖特定混合物配方奶粉或不含添加益生元的相同配方奶粉的人工喂养婴儿粪便菌群中双歧杆菌和梭菌的生长、可接受性及比例。

方法

足月出生后0至14天内,招募健康的人工喂养婴儿,使其接受益生元配方奶粉或标准配方奶粉。招募时进行人体测量。在6周和12周龄时重复测量。在纳入研究时和6周龄时采集粪便样本。通过荧光原位杂交法测定双歧杆菌和梭菌的数量。

结果

益生元配方奶粉耐受性良好。两组的身体生长情况相似。益生元组的排便频率显著更高(P = 0.031)。与对照组相比,益生元组婴儿的粪便也更软(P = 0.026)。研究开始时微生物的基线值相似。研究结束时,益生元组粪便中梭菌的百分比显著更低(P = 0.042),而与对照组相比,益生元组粪便中双歧杆菌的比例更高。然而,这种差异未达到统计学显著性(P = 0.262)。益生元组大肠杆菌的百分比更低,但同样未达到统计学显著性(P = 0.312)。

结论

含益生元低聚糖的婴儿配方奶粉耐受性良好,能实现正常的身体生长,并抑制粪便中梭菌的数量,粪便双歧杆菌百分比有升高趋势,大肠杆菌百分比有降低趋势。

相似文献

1
The effect of a prebiotic supplemented formula on growth and stool microbiology of term infants.添加益生元配方奶粉对足月儿生长及粪便微生物群的影响。
Early Hum Dev. 2008 Jan;84(1):45-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 Apr 11.
2
The effect of a fructo-oligosaccharide supplemented formula on gut flora of preterm infants.添加低聚果糖配方奶粉对早产儿肠道菌群的影响。
Early Hum Dev. 2007 May;83(5):335-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
3
Effects on faecal microbiota of dietary and acidic oligosaccharides in children during partial formula feeding.部分配方奶喂养期间饮食和酸性低聚糖对儿童粪便微生物群的影响。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 May;46(5):580-8. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318164d920.
4
[Randomised placebo controlled double blind study on the effect of prebiotic oligosaccharides on intestinal flora in healthy infants].[益生元低聚糖对健康婴儿肠道菌群影响的随机安慰剂对照双盲研究]
Orv Hetil. 2005 Nov 27;146(48):2445-50.
5
Physiological and bifidogenic effects of prebiotic supplements in infant formulae.婴儿配方食品中益生元补充剂的生理和双歧杆菌效应。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011 Jun;52(6):763-71. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182139f39.
6
Bifidogenic effects of solid weaning foods with added prebiotic oligosaccharides: a randomised controlled clinical trial.添加益生元低聚糖的固体断奶食品的双歧杆菌生成效应:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 May;42(5):553-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000221887.28877.c7.
7
Clinical evaluation of a new starter formula for infants containing live Bifidobacterium longum BL999 and prebiotics.一种含有长双歧杆菌BL999和益生元的新型婴儿起始配方奶粉的临床评估。
Nutrition. 2007 Jan;23(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2006.09.007.
8
Effects of prebiotic-containing infant formula on gastrointestinal tolerance and fecal microbiota in a randomized controlled trial.含益生元的婴儿配方对随机对照试验中胃肠道耐受性和粪便微生物群的影响。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 Jan;36(1 Suppl):95S-105S. doi: 10.1177/0148607111430087.
9
Growth of infant faecal bifidobacteria and clostridia on prebiotic oligosaccharides in in vitro conditions.婴儿粪便中双歧杆菌和梭菌在体外条件下对益生元低聚糖的生长情况。
Anaerobe. 2008 Oct;14(4):205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 May 17.
10
Effect of a whey-predominant starter formula containing LCPUFAs and oligosaccharides (FOS/GOS) on gastrointestinal comfort in infants.含长链多不饱和脂肪酸和低聚糖(FOS/GOS)的以乳清为主的起始配方奶粉对婴儿胃肠道舒适度的影响。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2010;19(4):473-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastrointestinal Health and Immunity of Milk Formula Supplemented with a Prebiotic Mixture of Short-Chain Galacto-oligosaccharides and Long-Chain Fructo-Oligosaccharides (9:1) in Healthy Infants and Toddlers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.含有短链低聚半乳糖和长链低聚果糖(9:1)益生元混合物的配方奶粉对健康婴幼儿胃肠道健康和免疫的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2025 Jan;28(1):1-18. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2025.28.1.1. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Effectiveness and safety study of formula containing probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics on fullterm infants' growth - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled study.含益生菌、益生元、合生元配方奶粉对足月儿生长的有效性和安全性研究——一项随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01506-9.
3
Prebiotic utilisation provides a competitive advantage , but is not reflected by an increased intestinal fitness.益生元的利用提供了竞争优势,但并未通过肠道健康状况的改善得以体现。
Gut Microbes. 2024 Jan-Dec;16(1):2338946. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2338946. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
4
Effect of a Novel E3 Probiotics Formula on the Gut Microbiome in Atopic Dermatitis Patients: A Pilot Study.新型E3益生菌配方对特应性皮炎患者肠道微生物群的影响:一项初步研究。
Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 11;10(11):2904. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112904.
5
Elucidating Human Milk Oligosaccharide biosynthetic genes through network-based multi-omics integration.通过基于网络的多组学整合阐明人乳寡糖生物合成基因。
Nat Commun. 2022 May 4;13(1):2455. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29867-4.
6
Benefits of dietary fibre for children in health and disease.膳食纤维对儿童健康和疾病的益处。
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Nov;107(11):973-979. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323571. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
Term Infant Formulas Influencing Gut Microbiota: An Overview.配方奶对肠道微生物群的影响:综述。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 23;13(12):4200. doi: 10.3390/nu13124200.
8
Dietary calcium phosphate strongly impacts gut microbiome changes elicited by inulin and galacto-oligosaccharides consumption.膳食磷酸钙强烈影响菊粉和半乳糖寡糖摄入引起的肠道微生物组变化。
Microbiome. 2021 Nov 4;9(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01148-0.
9
An Observational Real-Life Study with a New Infant Formula in Infants with Functional Gastro-Intestinal Disorders.一项新婴儿配方奶粉用于功能性胃肠疾病婴儿的观察性真实世界研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Sep 23;13(10):3336. doi: 10.3390/nu13103336.
10
The Effect of Infant Formulas With 4 or 8 g/L GOS/FOS on Growth, Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and Behavioral Patterns: A Prospective Cohort Study.含4克/升或8克/升低聚半乳糖/低聚果糖的婴儿配方奶粉对生长、胃肠道症状及行为模式的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究
Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 Sep 7;8:2333794X211044115. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211044115. eCollection 2021.