• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生会投票吗?

Do doctors vote?

作者信息

Grande David, Asch David A, Armstrong Katrina

机构信息

Robert Wood Johnson Health and Society Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):585-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0105-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-007-0105-8
PMID:17443365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1852914/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organizational leaders and scholars have issued calls for the medical profession to refocus its efforts on fulfilling the core tenets of professionalism. A key element of professionalism is participation in community affairs.

OBJECTIVE

To measure physician voting rates as an indicator of civic participation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of a subgroup of physicians from a nationally representative household survey of civilian, noninstitutionalized adult citizens.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 350,870 participants in the Current Population Survey (CPS) November Voter Supplement from 1996-2002, including 1,274 physicians and 1,886 lawyers; 414,989 participants in the CPS survey from 1976-1982, including 2,033 health professionals.

MEASUREMENTS

Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare adjusted physician voting rates in the 1996-2002 congressional and presidential elections with those of lawyers and the general population and to compare voting rates of health professionals in 1996-2002 with those in 1976-1992.

RESULTS

After multivariate adjustment for characteristics known to be associated with voting rates, physicians were less likely to vote than the general population in 1998 (odds ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.99), 2000 (odds ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.44-0.93), and 2002 (odds ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.80) but not 1996 (odds ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.59-1.17). Lawyers voted at higher rates than the general population and doctors in all four elections (P < .001). The pooled adjusted odds ratio for physician voting across the four elections was 0.70 (CI 0.61-0.81). No substantial changes in voting rates for health professionals were observed between 1976-1982 and 1996-2002.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians have lower adjusted voting rates than lawyers and the general population, suggesting reduced civic participation.

摘要

背景

组织领导者和学者呼吁医学专业重新将工作重点放在践行专业精神的核心原则上。专业精神的一个关键要素是参与社区事务。

目的

将医生的投票率作为公民参与度的一项指标进行衡量。

设计

对来自一项具有全国代表性的非机构化成年公民家庭调查中的一个医生亚组进行横断面调查。

参与者

1996 - 2002年《当前人口调查》(CPS)11月选民补充调查中的350,870名参与者,包括1,274名医生和1,886名律师;1976 - 1982年CPS调查中的414,989名参与者,包括2,033名卫生专业人员。

测量方法

使用多变量逻辑回归模型,比较1996 - 2002年国会选举和总统选举中经调整后的医生投票率与律师及普通人群的投票率,并比较1996 - 2002年卫生专业人员的投票率与1976 - 1992年的投票率。

结果

在对已知与投票率相关的特征进行多变量调整后,1998年(优势比0.76;95%置信区间[CI]0.59 - 0.99)、2000年(优势比0.64;95%CI 0.44 - 0.93)和2002年(优势比0.62;95%CI 0.48 - 0.80)医生投票的可能性低于普通人群,但1996年并非如此(优势比0.83;95%CI 0.59 - 1.17)。在所有四次选举中,律师的投票率均高于普通人群和医生(P <.001)。四次选举中医生投票的合并调整后优势比为0.70(CI 0.61 - 0.81)。1976 - 1982年与1996 - 2002年期间,未观察到卫生专业人员投票率有实质性变化。

结论

医生经调整后的投票率低于律师和普通人群,表明其公民参与度降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0172/2300237/3bfee73c5845/11606_2007_105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0172/2300237/5efc4662de1a/11606_2007_105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0172/2300237/3bfee73c5845/11606_2007_105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0172/2300237/5efc4662de1a/11606_2007_105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0172/2300237/3bfee73c5845/11606_2007_105_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Do doctors vote?医生会投票吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):585-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0105-8.
2
Examining Pediatric Residency Voting Practices.考察儿科住院医师投票实践。
South Med J. 2021 Jan;114(1):13-16. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001191.
3
Increasing Voter Participation Through Health Care-Based Voter Registration.通过医疗保健为选民登记提高选民参与度。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241563. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1563.
4
Disability and voting.残疾与投票权。
Disabil Health J. 2014 Jul;7(3):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
5
Ensuring Equitable Access to Participation in the Electoral Process: A Policy Brief From the American College of Physicians.确保公平参与选举过程:美国医师学院政策简报。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan;177(1):68-69. doi: 10.7326/M23-2293. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
Political Priorities, Voting, and Political Action Committee Engagement of Emergency Medicine Trainees: A National Survey.急诊医学住院医师的政治优先事项、投票和政治行动委员会参与情况:一项全国性调查。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 May 5;24(3):469-478. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59351.
7
Community volunteerism of US physicians.美国医生的社区志愿服务
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):1987-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0811-x. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
8
Association between cigarette smoking status and voting intentions: Cross sectional surveys in England 2015-2020.吸烟状况与投票意向的关联:2015-2020 年英格兰的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):2254. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12304-4.
9
Socioeconomic inequality in voting participation and self-rated health.投票参与度和自评健康状况中的社会经济不平等。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):99-104. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.99.
10
Voter participation among people attending mental health services in Ireland.爱尔兰精神卫生服务就诊人群中的投票参与率。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):925-929. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1921-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The importance of physician advocacy.医生宣传的重要性。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2025 May 27;38(5):765-766. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2507547. eCollection 2025.
2
Medical students value advocacy and health policy training in undergraduate medical education: A mixed methods study.医学生重视本科医学教育中的宣传及卫生政策培训:一项混合方法研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb 28;9(1):e61. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.35. eCollection 2025.
3
Voting Trends Among Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Trainees.耳鼻咽喉头颈外科住院医师的投票趋势

本文引用的文献

1
Twenty-year trends in regional variations in the U.S. physician workforce.美国医师劳动力区域差异的二十年趋势。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR90-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.90.
2
Physician-citizens--public roles and professional obligations.医生公民——公共角色与职业义务。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):94-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.94.
3
A loss of faith: the sources of reduced political legitimacy for the American medical profession.信仰的丧失:美国医学职业政治合法性降低的根源。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Feb 22;10(1):e70103. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70103. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Residents Vote! A Framework and Toolkit to Improve Resident Voting Rates.居民投票!提高居民投票率的框架与工具包。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Feb;17(1):96-100. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00509.1. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
5
Physician Voting Rates in the 2020 and 2022 US Elections.2020年和2022年美国选举中的医生投票率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Feb 7;6(2):e245443. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5443.
6
Upstream Advocacy: Family Medicine Promotion of Voting.上游倡导:家庭医学对投票的推动
Fam Med. 2024 Oct 16;56(10):620-2. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.724313.
7
What are the attitudes of medical students and housestaff towards health advocacy? A physician-led voter registration initiative and health advocacy survey.医学生和住院医生对健康宣传的态度是怎样的?一项由医生主导的选民登记倡议及健康宣传调查。
Am J Med Open. 2022 Sep 3;8:100023. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100023. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Reported Political Participation by Physicians vs Nonphysicians.医生与非医生的政治参与情况报告
JAMA. 2024 Apr 23;331(16):1413-1415. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.1996.
9
Political Priorities, Voting, and Political Action Committee Engagement of Emergency Medicine Trainees: A National Survey.急诊医学住院医师的政治优先事项、投票和政治行动委员会参与情况:一项全国性调查。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 May 5;24(3):469-478. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59351.
10
Analysis of Reported Voting Behaviors of US Physicians, 2000-2020.分析 2000-2020 年美国医生的投票行为报告
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42527.
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):185-235. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00010.
4
The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students' perceptions.职业失误剖析:弥合传统框架与学生认知之间的差距
Acad Med. 2002 Jun;77(6):516-22. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200206000-00007.
5
Assessing professional behavior: yesterday, today, and tomorrow.评估职业行为:过去、现在与未来。
Acad Med. 2002 Jun;77(6):502-15. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200206000-00006.
6
Declaration of Professional Responsibility: Medicine's Social Contract with Humanity.专业责任宣言:医学与人类的社会契约。
Mo Med. 2002 May;99(5):195.
7
Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter.新千年的医学职业精神:一份医师宪章
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Feb 5;136(3):243-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00012.
8
Public roles for the medical profession in the United States: beyond theories of decline and fall.美国医学专业的公共角色:超越衰落理论
Milbank Q. 2001;79(3):327-53, III. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00211.
9
Growth of specialization in graduate medical education.
JAMA. 2000 Sep 13;284(10):1284-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.10.1284.
10
Professionalism: an ideal to be sustained.专业精神:一种需要坚守的理想。
Lancet. 2000 Jul 8;356(9224):156-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02458-2.