Schuurman Nadine, Bell Nathaniel, Dunn James R, Oliver Lisa
Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, RCB 7123, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
J Urban Health. 2007 Jul;84(4):591-603. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9193-3. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
Area-based deprivation indices (ABDIs) have become a common tool with which to investigate the patterns and magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in health. ABDIs are also used as a proxy for individual socioeconomic status. Despite their widespread use, comparably less attention has been focused on their geographic variability and practical concerns surrounding the Modifiable Area Unit Problem (MAUP) than on the individual attributes that make up the indices. Although scale is increasingly recognized as an important factor in interpreting mapped results among population health researchers, less attention has been paid specifically to ABDI and scale. In this paper, we highlight the effect of scale on indices by mapping ABDIs at multiple census scales in an urban area. In addition, we compare self-rated health data from the Canadian Community Health Survey with ABDIs at two census scales. The results of our analysis confirm the influence of spatial extent and scale on mapping population health-with potential implications for health policy implementation and resource distribution.
基于区域的贫困指数(ABDIs)已成为一种常用工具,用于调查健康方面社会经济不平等的模式和程度。ABDIs也被用作个体社会经济地位的替代指标。尽管它们被广泛使用,但与构成这些指数的个体属性相比,人们对其地理变异性以及围绕可修改区域单元问题(MAUP)的实际问题关注相对较少。虽然在人口健康研究人员中,尺度越来越被认为是解释地图结果的一个重要因素,但对ABDI和尺度的具体关注较少。在本文中,我们通过绘制城市地区多个普查尺度的ABDIs来突出尺度对指数的影响。此外,我们将加拿大社区健康调查的自评健康数据与两个普查尺度的ABDIs进行比较。我们的分析结果证实了空间范围和尺度对绘制人口健康地图的影响——这对健康政策实施和资源分配可能具有潜在影响。