Mafune Kosuke, Kosugi Shotaro
Waseda University.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2007 Feb;77(6):512-8. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.77.512.
This longitudinal study examines the situational specificity of coping strategies for 3 943 male employees of the research and development division of an industrial company. The Job Stress Scale-Revised version (JSS-R) was administered twice to the same subjects 40 months apart to assess chronic job stressors (qualitative and quantitative) and coping strategies (problem-solving, support-seeking, and problem-leaving). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine changes in coping strategies corresponding to changes in chronic job stressors. The results suggest a situational specificity of coping strategies. (a) With decreasing qualitative stressors, "problem-solving" coping increases and "problem-leaving" coping decreases. (b) With increasing qualitative stressors, "problem-leaving" coping increases and "problem-solving" coping decreases. (c) With increasing quantitative stressors, "support-seeking" coping increases. (d) With decreasing quantitative stressors, "problem-leaving" coping decreases. (e) There is no variance in "problem-leaving" coping attributable to the change in the quantitative stressors when the qualitative stressors decrease or increase. "Problem-leaving" coping is more strongly related to qualitative than quantitative stressors.
这项纵向研究考察了一家工业公司研发部门的3943名男性员工应对策略的情境特异性。研究人员对同一批受试者相隔40个月进行了两次修订版工作压力量表(JSS-R)测试,以评估慢性工作压力源(定性和定量)及应对策略(解决问题、寻求支持和逃避问题)。方差分析(ANOVA)用于检验与慢性工作压力源变化相对应的应对策略变化。结果表明应对策略具有情境特异性。(a)随着定性压力源的减少,“解决问题”的应对方式增加,“逃避问题”的应对方式减少。(b)随着定性压力源的增加,“逃避问题”的应对方式增加,“解决问题”的应对方式减少。(c)随着定量压力源的增加,“寻求支持”的应对方式增加。(d)随着定量压力源的减少,“逃避问题”的应对方式减少。(e)当定性压力源减少或增加时,“逃避问题”的应对方式不会因定量压力源的变化而产生差异。“逃避问题”的应对方式与定性压力源的关联比与定量压力源的关联更强。