Shimazu A, Kosugi S
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature, Waseda University, Tokyo.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1998 Aug;69(3):198-205. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.69.198.
A causal model of job stressors and stress reactions was examined to clarify the developmental process of employee maladjustment in work place. Two thousand seven hundred twenty-eight (2728) employees of a research institute in the automobile industry completed Job Stress Scale (JSS), which measured job stressors, stress reactions, coping strategies, and social support. Three hundred ninety-two (392) employees with high stress reaction scores were interviewed to obtain information to construct a theoretical model. Then, the model was evaluated with covariance structure analysis. Results showed that the quantitative job stressors had only an indirect effect, mediated by fatigue and irritability, on mental instability, whereas qualitative ones had both direct and indirect effects. The findings suggest that the developmental processes of employee maladjustment in work place differ depending on the kind of job stressors they experience.
为了阐明员工在工作场所适应不良的发展过程,研究了工作压力源与压力反应的因果模型。汽车行业一家研究机构的2728名员工完成了工作压力量表(JSS),该量表测量了工作压力源、压力反应、应对策略和社会支持。对392名压力反应得分高的员工进行了访谈,以获取构建理论模型的信息。然后,用协方差结构分析对该模型进行评估。结果表明,定量工作压力源仅通过疲劳和易怒对心理不稳定产生间接影响,而定性工作压力源则具有直接和间接影响。研究结果表明,员工在工作场所适应不良的发展过程因他们所经历的工作压力源类型而异。